Case study:Zeegserloopje: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
|Project picture=Waterlichamen Hunze en Aas.png
|Project picture=Waterlichamen Hunze en Aas.png
|Picture description=WFD water bodies in the Hunze en Aa's water authority region. The Zeegserloopje is part of the Drentse Aa water body.
|Picture description=WFD water bodies in the Hunze en Aa's water authority region. The Zeegserloopje is part of the Drentse Aa water body.
|Project summary=The Zeegserloopje is a tributary of the Drentse Aa, which has a generally good or average ecological condition. In order to improve ecological conditions and meet WFD criteria, the mowing regime in the Zeegserloopje was altered.
|Project summary=The Zeegserloopje is a tributary of the Drentse Aa, which has a generally good or average ecological condition. In order to improve ecological conditions and meet WFD criteria, the mowing regime in the Zeegserloopje was altered. See also: http://www.rtvdrenthe.nl/nieuws/168154/Waterschap-verhoogt-beken-Drentsche-Aa-gebied-Omliggende-natuur-kan-zo-natter-blijven
|Monitoring surveys and results=Hydrological and ecological parameters are regularly monitored. This includes water levels, discharges, bed profiles, terrestrial biodiversity, water quality and macroinvertebrate numbers. The new mowing regime increases the inundation risk of upstream areas, which are mitigated by local mowing.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Hydrological and ecological parameters are regularly monitored. This includes water levels, discharges, bed profiles, terrestrial biodiversity, water quality and macroinvertebrate numbers. The new mowing regime increases the inundation risk of upstream areas, which are mitigated by local mowing.
|Project title=Zeegserloopje
|Project title=Zeegserloopje
Line 60: Line 60:
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references
{{Additional links and references
|Link=https://www.rtvdrenthe.nl/nieuws/168154/Waterschap-verhoogt-beken-Drentsche-Aa-gebied-Omliggende-natuur-kan-zo-natter-blijven
|Link=www.rtvdrenthe.nl/nieuws/168154/Waterschap-verhoogt-beken-Drentsche-Aa-gebied-Omliggende-natuur-kan-zo-natter-blijven
|Description=News item about the water authority's restoration measures in this region
|Description=News item about the water authority's restoration measures in this region
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 13:15, 9 March 2021

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 3' 37.36" N, 6° 37' 7.16" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Water quality
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Emiel
Main contact surname Galetzka
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Waterschap Hunze en Aa's
Contact organisation web site http://www.hunzeenaas.nl
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Building with nature measures in streams

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
WFD water bodies in the Hunze en Aa's water authority region. The Zeegserloopje is part of the Drentse Aa water body.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Zeegserloopje is a tributary of the Drentse Aa, which has a generally good or average ecological condition. In order to improve ecological conditions and meet WFD criteria, the mowing regime in the Zeegserloopje was altered. See also: http://www.rtvdrenthe.nl/nieuws/168154/Waterschap-verhoogt-beken-Drentsche-Aa-gebied-Omliggende-natuur-kan-zo-natter-blijven

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Hydrological and ecological parameters are regularly monitored. This includes water levels, discharges, bed profiles, terrestrial biodiversity, water quality and macroinvertebrate numbers. The new mowing regime increases the inundation risk of upstream areas, which are mitigated by local mowing.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Ems
River basin Nedereems

Subcatchment

River name Drentsche Aa
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Central Plains
Dominant land cover Grassland, Intensive agriculture (arable), Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Moorland/heathland
Waterbody ID NL33DA



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Anloërdiepje, Gastersche Diep, Taarlosche Diep


Site

Name Zeegserloopje near Drentse Aa
WFD water body codes NL33DA
WFD (national) typology R5
WFD water body name Drentse Aa
Pre-project morphology Actively meandering
Reference morphology Actively meandering
Desired post project morphology Actively meandering
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations Nationaal park Drentse Aa
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Sand, Peat
River corridor land use Grassland, Intensive agriculture (arable), Tall herb/rank vegetation
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.rtvdrenthe.nl/nieuws/168154/Waterschap-verhoogt-beken-Drentsche-Aa-gebied-Omliggende-natuur-kan-zo-natter-blijven News item about the water authority's restoration measures in this region

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information