Case study:Koningsdiep: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Project web site url= | |Project web site url=www.fryslan.frl/beleidsthemas/gebiedsontwikkelingsprojecten_3553/item/koningsdiep_1846.html | ||
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Water quality | |Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Water quality | ||
|Country=Netherlands | |Country=Netherlands | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Building with nature measures in streams | |Name of parent multi-site project=Building with nature measures in streams | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Stream restoration measures in the Koningsdiep aim to create a larger habitat for the species present. The stream discharge was reduced through the creation of a meander, so that a culvert does not have to be closed to prevent downstream water damage. A fish passage was created in the meander. Dead wood trunks and branches were introduced in the newly dug-out part to narrow the stream. | |Project summary=Stream restoration measures in the Koningsdiep aim to create a larger habitat for the species present. The stream discharge was reduced through the creation of a meander, so that a culvert does not have to be closed to prevent downstream water damage. This culvert is important to ensure animals' ability to migrate in the area. A fish passage was created in the meander. Dead wood trunks and branches were introduced in the newly dug-out part to narrow the stream. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=The meander has started to get overgrown because of the high nutrient load in the water. The water authority has chosen not to intervene yet, as they expect that this a temporary situation to which the stream will eventually adjust. | |Monitoring surveys and results=The meander has started to get overgrown because of the high nutrient load in the water. The water authority has chosen not to intervene yet, as they expect that this a temporary situation to which the stream will eventually adjust. | ||
|Project title=Koningsdiep | |Project title=Koningsdiep | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Friese Wateren | ||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Koningsdiep | |||
|WFD water body code=NL02L4 | |||
|WFD (national) typology=R5 | |||
|WFD water body name=Koningsdiep | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Actively meandering | |||
|Reference morphology=Straightened, | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Low gradient passively meandering, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Dominant substrate=Sand | |||
|River corridor land use=Grassland, Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Moorland/heathland, | |||
|Mean discharge category=0.1 - 1.0 m³/s | |||
|Average channel gradient category=Less than 0.001 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} |
Latest revision as of 13:54, 1 February 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.fryslan.frl/beleidsthemas/gebiedsontwikkelingsprojecten_3553/item/koningsdiep_1846.html |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Water quality |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Koos |
Main contact surname | Koops |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Wetterskip Fryslân |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wetterskipfryslan.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Stream restoration measures in the Koningsdiep aim to create a larger habitat for the species present. The stream discharge was reduced through the creation of a meander, so that a culvert does not have to be closed to prevent downstream water damage. This culvert is important to ensure animals' ability to migrate in the area. A fish passage was created in the meander. Dead wood trunks and branches were introduced in the newly dug-out part to narrow the stream.
Monitoring surveys and results
The meander has started to get overgrown because of the high nutrient load in the water. The water authority has chosen not to intervene yet, as they expect that this a temporary situation to which the stream will eventually adjust.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Linde
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|