Case study:Restoration in Bognelva: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=69.9519609, 22.386196400000017 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Restoration in Bognelva |Status=Complete...") |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Country=Norway | |Country=Norway | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
|Contact organisation=The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) | |Contact organisation=The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.nve.no | |Contact organisation url=www.nve.no | ||
|Partner organisations=NMBU and NaturRestaurering | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Massive reconstruction of the lower 3,5 km of the Bogn river, including canalization and structural modifications to the main river and side channels the last 100 years had negative impact on landscape, biodiversity and productive populations of anadromous fish. The disappearance of fish led to local interests among fishermen, farmers and landowners to restore the river. Since numerous restoration measures were planned and implemented. The main aims was to restore the natural dynamics and diversity of the river system and its interactions with the surrounding valley. Since 2005, side channels and tributaries have been re-opened and re-established, habitat improvements such as pools and channels have been re-created, and scientific studies have been initiated for investigating the before and after situation for fish populations and biodiversity. Importantly, a strong and active local engagement has secured the success of this project. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Habitat diversity, bird species, fish densities are included. Improved fish density and catchment. | |||
|Lessons learn=Make a good story and go for it. Involvement and local engagement is the key to success. | |||
|Project title=Restoration in Bognelva | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
{{Project background}} | |Name=Bognelva | ||
{{Motivations}} | |WFD water body code=211.8Z | ||
{{Measures}} | |WFD water body name=Bognelva | ||
|Pre-project morphology=Channelled river | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Meandering river | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Species=different fish species | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=3500 | |||
|Project started=2003 | |||
|Total1 cost=80 | |||
|Funding sources=Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=NVE | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Knut Aune | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Hoseth | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Langfjordbotn JFF | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Bjørn O. | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Dønnum | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=NMBU / NaturRestaurering | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Jonathan E. | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Colman | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=NVE | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=NMBU / Naturrestaurering | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=The channelled river led to disapperance of fish | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Morphological diversification, Restoration of side channels, Reopening of side channels, Creation of pools, habitat improvements, | |||
|Social measures=Local public awareness, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Channel pattern/planform | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Quantity & dynamics of flow | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Other responses header}} | {{Other responses header}} | ||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Birds | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Inconclusive | |||
}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Increased recreation | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
Line 37: | Line 126: | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
{{Additional links and references header}} | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=https://www.nina.no/archive/nina/PppBasePdf/temahefte/042.pdf | |||
|Description=Colman, J.E. et al. 2010. Restaurering av Bognelva, Langfjordbotn. NINA Special Report, pp. 83-87. | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} | {{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 09:47, 25 February 2020
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Knut Aune |
Main contact surname | Hoseth |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.nve.no |
Partner organisations | NMBU and NaturRestaurering |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Massive reconstruction of the lower 3,5 km of the Bogn river, including canalization and structural modifications to the main river and side channels the last 100 years had negative impact on landscape, biodiversity and productive populations of anadromous fish. The disappearance of fish led to local interests among fishermen, farmers and landowners to restore the river. Since numerous restoration measures were planned and implemented. The main aims was to restore the natural dynamics and diversity of the river system and its interactions with the surrounding valley. Since 2005, side channels and tributaries have been re-opened and re-established, habitat improvements such as pools and channels have been re-created, and scientific studies have been initiated for investigating the before and after situation for fish populations and biodiversity. Importantly, a strong and active local engagement has secured the success of this project.
Monitoring surveys and results
Habitat diversity, bird species, fish densities are included. Improved fish density and catchment.
Lessons learnt
Make a good story and go for it. Involvement and local engagement is the key to success.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|