Case study:Beekherstel Willinkbeek: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring | |Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
|Contact organisation=Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel | |Contact organisation=Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.wrij.nl/ | |Contact organisation url=www.wrij.nl/ | ||
|Partner organisations=STOWA | |||
|Name of parent multi-site project=- | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Naamloos.png | |||
|Picture description=Willinkbeek | |||
|Project summary=Stroomafwaarts van Döttekrö ontbreekt dynamiek in de Wilinkbeek omdat piekafvoer via Koppelleiding wordt afgevoerd. Veel trajecten hebben nog kunstmatig verhard talud en beekbodem als gevolg van puin en slakkenbestorting. Door deze puinbestorting weg te halen zal de beek een morfologisch afwisselende, kronkelende beek worden door bosstroken van tenminste 10 meter breed. Omdat erosie en sedimentatie vrij spel hebben, zulllen meanders, zandbanken en stroomkuilen zich vormen op telkens nieuwe plekken. De beek zal het grootste deel van het jaar afvoer hebben. Vanwege ligging in een vaak bosrijke omgeving hopen zich op rustige plekken in de beek bladeren, takken en boomstammen op. De beek is geheel optrekbaar voor vis. | |||
|Project title=Beekherstel Willinkbeek | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
Line 20: | Line 25: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Berkel | ||
{{Project background}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Site | ||
{{Measures}} | |Name=Willinkbeek | ||
|WFD water body code=NL07_0021 | |||
|WFD (national) typology=R5, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Dominant substrate=Keileem | |||
|River corridor land use=Plantation forestry, | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m | |||
|Avrg bankfull channel width=4.5 | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=Less than 0.5 m | |||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=0.2 | |||
|Mean discharge category=0.1 - 1.0 m³/s | |||
|Mn discharge=0.225 | |||
|Average channel gradient category=0.001 - 0.01 | |||
|Avrg channel gradient=0.0011 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Project started=2019 | |||
|Works completed=2019/12/01 | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Width & depth variation, | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Oxygen balance, PH, Temperature, | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Puinbestorting verwijderd | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Width & depth variation | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Oxygen balance | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=PH | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Temperature | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Other responses header}} | {{Other responses header}} |
Latest revision as of 14:32, 30 September 2019
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | John |
Main contact surname | Lenssen |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wrij.nl/ |
Partner organisations | STOWA |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Stroomafwaarts van Döttekrö ontbreekt dynamiek in de Wilinkbeek omdat piekafvoer via Koppelleiding wordt afgevoerd. Veel trajecten hebben nog kunstmatig verhard talud en beekbodem als gevolg van puin en slakkenbestorting. Door deze puinbestorting weg te halen zal de beek een morfologisch afwisselende, kronkelende beek worden door bosstroken van tenminste 10 meter breed. Omdat erosie en sedimentatie vrij spel hebben, zulllen meanders, zandbanken en stroomkuilen zich vormen op telkens nieuwe plekken. De beek zal het grootste deel van het jaar afvoer hebben. Vanwege ligging in een vaak bosrijke omgeving hopen zich op rustige plekken in de beek bladeren, takken en boomstammen op. De beek is geheel optrekbaar voor vis.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beekherstel Eefsebeek, Beekherstel Leerinkbeek, Beekherstel Ramsbeek, Beneden-Berkel, Boldersbeek
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|