Case study:Beekherstel Eefsebeek: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=In progress | |||
|Status= | |||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring | |Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring | ||
|Country=Netherlands | |Country=Netherlands | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
|Contact organisation=Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel | |Contact organisation=Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.wrij.nl/ | |Contact organisation url=www.wrij.nl/ | ||
|Partner organisations=STOWA | |||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Building with Nature | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Berkel oude eefsebeek reng 1.jpg | |||
|Picture description=De oude Eefsebeek | |||
|Project summary=The Eefse Beek water body is classified as a river under the WFD system. It is an R5 category water body: slow-flowing middle/lower reach on sand. The entire Eefse Beek is managed by water authority Rijn en IJssel. The water body is located in the province of Gelderland, municipality Lochem. It is 12,1 km long and has a catchment of 4080 hectares. The water body is composed of the Eefse Beek and its tributaries, the Molenbeek and Huurnerbeek. The water body originates in its own catchment and discharges into the river IJssel via the Twentekanaal. Water levels in the Eefse Beek are managed with three adjustable weirs. None of these weirs are passable for fish. In the Eefse Beek water body, a single water level is pursued for each managed stretch. The Eefse Beek carries water all year, with an occasional dry period in summer. There are no sewage treatment plants present in its catchment. | |||
Water authority performed several field tests with main channel mowing. The purpose of these tests was to create a validation data set with which the minimum required width of the mowed main channel could be tested. To this end, a different width was mowed in each test. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results=When the cleared channel portion is widened from 2m to 4m, this results in a significant change in surface water level slope. A widening from 4m to 6m does not have such an effect. The portion of the river in which the water can flow freely can be reduced significantly reduced when sediment builds up on the edges of the channel. | |||
|Project title=Beekherstel Eefsebeek | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
Line 20: | Line 28: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Berkel | |||
}} | |||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name=Eefsebeek | |Name=Eefsebeek | ||
|WFD water body code=NL07_0025 | |||
|WFD (national) typology=R5, | |WFD (national) typology=R5, | ||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |Heavily modified water body=Yes | ||
Line 35: | Line 46: | ||
|Mean discharge category=1 - 10 m³/s | |Mean discharge category=1 - 10 m³/s | ||
|Mn discharge=2.225 | |Mn discharge=2.225 | ||
|Average channel gradient category= | |Average channel gradient category=Less than 0.001 | ||
|Avrg channel gradient= | |Avrg channel gradient=0.00023 | ||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Project started=2017 | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Flow velocities, Width & depth variation, | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish, Invertebrates, | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Oxygen balance, PH, Temperature, | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Stroombaanmaaien, | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Flow velocities | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Width & depth variation | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Substrate conditions | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Invertebrates | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Macrophytes | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Oxygen balance | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=PH | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Temperature | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Other responses header}} | {{Other responses header}} |
Latest revision as of 11:55, 1 April 2021
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | John |
Main contact surname | Lenssen |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Rijn en Ijssel |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wrij.nl/ |
Partner organisations | STOWA |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Eefse Beek water body is classified as a river under the WFD system. It is an R5 category water body: slow-flowing middle/lower reach on sand. The entire Eefse Beek is managed by water authority Rijn en IJssel. The water body is located in the province of Gelderland, municipality Lochem. It is 12,1 km long and has a catchment of 4080 hectares. The water body is composed of the Eefse Beek and its tributaries, the Molenbeek and Huurnerbeek. The water body originates in its own catchment and discharges into the river IJssel via the Twentekanaal. Water levels in the Eefse Beek are managed with three adjustable weirs. None of these weirs are passable for fish. In the Eefse Beek water body, a single water level is pursued for each managed stretch. The Eefse Beek carries water all year, with an occasional dry period in summer. There are no sewage treatment plants present in its catchment.
Water authority performed several field tests with main channel mowing. The purpose of these tests was to create a validation data set with which the minimum required width of the mowed main channel could be tested. To this end, a different width was mowed in each test.
Monitoring surveys and results
When the cleared channel portion is widened from 2m to 4m, this results in a significant change in surface water level slope. A widening from 4m to 6m does not have such an effect. The portion of the river in which the water can flow freely can be reduced significantly reduced when sediment builds up on the edges of the channel.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beekherstel Leerinkbeek, Beekherstel Ramsbeek, Beekherstel Willinkbeek, Beneden-Berkel, Boldersbeek
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|