Case study:Rfff: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
|Location= | |Location=53.0221797255875, 5.055244445800784 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Country=Netherlands | |Country=Netherlands | ||
|Main contact forename= | |Main contact forename=d | ||
|Main contact surname= | |Main contact surname=d | ||
|Contact organisation= | |Contact organisation=h | ||
|Multi-site=Yes | |Multi-site=Yes | ||
|Project title=rfff | |Project title=rfff | ||
Line 23: | Line 20: | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|WFD (national) typology=R5 | |WFD (national) typology=R5 | ||
|Pre-project morphology=Sterk Veranderend | |Pre-project morphology=Sterk Veranderend | ||
Line 31: | Line 27: | ||
|River corridor land use=Plantation forestry, Intensive agriculture (arable), | |River corridor land use=Plantation forestry, Intensive agriculture (arable), | ||
|Average bankfull channel width category=5 - 10 m | |Average bankfull channel width category=5 - 10 m | ||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | ||
|Mean discharge category=1 - 10 m³/s | |Mean discharge category=1 - 10 m³/s | ||
|Average channel gradient category=more than 0.1 | |Average channel gradient category=more than 0.1 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background | ||
|Project started=2015/01/01 | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} | ||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} |
Latest revision as of 14:50, 4 July 2022
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 53° 1' 19.85" N, 5° 3' 18.88" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | d |
Main contact surname | d |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | h |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|