Case study:Creating a fishpass at Włocławek dam: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 18: Line 18:
|Project summary=The Włocławek dam was equipped with a conventional step-pool fishpass, which initially was functional, but not enough to sustain free fish migration through the dam. After few years of hydropower plant exploitation the bottom erosion below the dam caused gradual decline of fishpass efficiency due to lowering of water level, so it was functional only at high flows. Finally, all but one entrance windows were situated above the water surface at average flow.  
|Project summary=The Włocławek dam was equipped with a conventional step-pool fishpass, which initially was functional, but not enough to sustain free fish migration through the dam. After few years of hydropower plant exploitation the bottom erosion below the dam caused gradual decline of fishpass efficiency due to lowering of water level, so it was functional only at high flows. Finally, all but one entrance windows were situated above the water surface at average flow.  


- First action to prevent bottom erosion, undertaken by water authorities, was construction of a stabilizing stone ramp of two meters high just 500 m below the dam. (Phot. 4) This slowed down the bottom erosion, but created a new obstacle for fish migration, especially at low water flows. However there are vivid plans to build a new dam located about 20 km below the existing one to stop the bottom erosion and ensure safety of the existing dam. Such new dam and reservoir will create an additional barrier for fish migration, which was recently improved by the reconstruction of the Włocławek fishpass.
- First action to prevent bottom erosion, undertaken by water authorities, was construction of a stabilizing stone ramp of two meters high just 500 m below the dam. This slowed down the bottom erosion, but created a new obstacle for fish migration, especially at low water flows. However there are vivid plans to build a new dam located about 20 km below the existing one to stop the bottom erosion and ensure safety of the existing dam. Such new dam and reservoir will create an additional barrier for fish migration, which was recently improved by the reconstruction of the Włocławek fishpass.


The fishpass at Włocławek dam was recently (2014) reconstructed (Photo 5 & 6) into vertical slot type, with new entrance window and additional attractive current provided with a pipe. It was equipped with monitoring system, including VAKI scanner (Photo 7) that enables constant monitoring of fish passage and fish trap in top fishpass chamber which provides possibility of individual fish measurements, condition assessment and tagging.
The fishpass at Włocławek dam was recently (2014) reconstructed into vertical slot type, with new entrance window and additional attractive current provided with a pipe. It was equipped with monitoring system, including VAKI scanner that enables constant monitoring of fish passage and fish trap in top fishpass chamber which provides possibility of individual fish measurements, condition assessment and tagging.
|Monitoring surveys and results=In 2016, a total 7818 fish were recorded migrating upstream, mainly in April-May and October. Bream Abramis brama dominated with almost 5000 individuals, followed by anadromous species – sea trout Salmo trutta L., and vimba Vimba vimba at 8111 and 1123 respectively. Asp Aspius aspius, barbel Barbus barbus, catfish Silurus glanis, carp Cyprinus carpio, ide Leuciscus idus, perch Perca fluviatilis, atlantic salmon Salmo salar, chub Leuciscus cephalus, grass carp Carassius gibelio and roach Rutilus rutilus were also noted. The total number of fish were almost two times higher than in 2015 (Dębowski 2017). During present year tens of thousands of records were collected and still under analyzing. Much more numerous in this year is vimba and white bream Abramis bjoerkna. Also, white-eye bream Ballerus sapa was recorded.  
|Monitoring surveys and results=In 2016, a total 7818 fish were recorded migrating upstream, mainly in April-May and October. Bream Abramis brama dominated with almost 5000 individuals, followed by anadromous species – sea trout Salmo trutta L., and vimba Vimba vimba at 8111 and 1123 respectively. Asp Aspius aspius, barbel Barbus barbus, catfish Silurus glanis, carp Cyprinus carpio, ide Leuciscus idus, perch Perca fluviatilis, atlantic salmon Salmo salar, chub Leuciscus cephalus, grass carp Carassius gibelio and roach Rutilus rutilus were also noted. The total number of fish were almost two times higher than in 2015 (Dębowski 2017). During present year tens of thousands of records were collected and still under analyzing. Much more numerous in this year is vimba and white bream Abramis bjoerkna. Also, white-eye bream Ballerus sapa was recorded.  


Line 63: Line 63:
|Mn discharge=1046
|Mn discharge=1046
}}
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background
|Project started=2014/01/01
|Project completed=2014/12/31
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Specific mitigation=Hydropower,
|Specific mitigation=Hydropower, Barriers to fish migration,
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport, Width & depth variation,
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport, Width & depth variation,
|Biological quality elements=Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition,
|Biological quality elements=Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition,
}}
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Creation of fish passes, Construction of a stabilising stone ramp
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Monitoring system in fish pass
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
Line 83: Line 89:
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references
|Link=amber.international/portfolio-item/the-wloclawek-dam-poland/
|Description=All information on this page is copied from The Stanisław Sakowicz Inland Fisheries Institute (SSIFI)
}}
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Supplementary Information
|Information=References
 
Dębowski P (2017). Fish passage through the Włocławek Dam fishway in 2016. Kom. Ryb. 2:1-6. (in Polish with English summary)
}}
{{Toggle content end}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 12:59, 14 November 2018

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 37' 4.00" N, 19° 24' 28.00" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://https://amber.international/portfolio-item/the-wloclawek-dam-poland/
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower
Country Poland
Main contact forename Zdzisław
Main contact surname Zakęś
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site http://www.infish.com.pl/en/content/about-institute
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Vistula River Natural Stretch. (Katarzyna Suska SSIFI).

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Włocławek dam was equipped with a conventional step-pool fishpass, which initially was functional, but not enough to sustain free fish migration through the dam. After few years of hydropower plant exploitation the bottom erosion below the dam caused gradual decline of fishpass efficiency due to lowering of water level, so it was functional only at high flows. Finally, all but one entrance windows were situated above the water surface at average flow.

- First action to prevent bottom erosion, undertaken by water authorities, was construction of a stabilizing stone ramp of two meters high just 500 m below the dam. This slowed down the bottom erosion, but created a new obstacle for fish migration, especially at low water flows. However there are vivid plans to build a new dam located about 20 km below the existing one to stop the bottom erosion and ensure safety of the existing dam. Such new dam and reservoir will create an additional barrier for fish migration, which was recently improved by the reconstruction of the Włocławek fishpass.

The fishpass at Włocławek dam was recently (2014) reconstructed into vertical slot type, with new entrance window and additional attractive current provided with a pipe. It was equipped with monitoring system, including VAKI scanner that enables constant monitoring of fish passage and fish trap in top fishpass chamber which provides possibility of individual fish measurements, condition assessment and tagging.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


In 2016, a total 7818 fish were recorded migrating upstream, mainly in April-May and October. Bream Abramis brama dominated with almost 5000 individuals, followed by anadromous species – sea trout Salmo trutta L., and vimba Vimba vimba at 8111 and 1123 respectively. Asp Aspius aspius, barbel Barbus barbus, catfish Silurus glanis, carp Cyprinus carpio, ide Leuciscus idus, perch Perca fluviatilis, atlantic salmon Salmo salar, chub Leuciscus cephalus, grass carp Carassius gibelio and roach Rutilus rutilus were also noted. The total number of fish were almost two times higher than in 2015 (Dębowski 2017). During present year tens of thousands of records were collected and still under analyzing. Much more numerous in this year is vimba and white bream Abramis bjoerkna. Also, white-eye bream Ballerus sapa was recorded.

In 2016, system with six PIT antennas was lunched in fishpass. First antennae on the entrance, second on the first corner, two next below and above Vaki scanner, fifth on last corner and last on the exit. Nine adult sea trout were caught in trap installed in last fishpass chamber and tagged with 12 mm PITs in November during spawning migration. Tagged fish were released after anesthesia below dam. Four of them again entered a fishway and move upstream. One female which successfully passed was recaptured half year later in Gulf of Gdańsk by commercial fisherman. In 2017 new experiment with three antennae system has been conducted. In 18 October, 112 specimens from nine species included; bream, asp, vimba, sea trout, dace, barbel, ide, white-eyed bream and bleak were tagged and released below the weir. The system is already running.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Vistula River Natural Stretch. (Katarzyna Suska SSIFI).
Stabilizing stone ramp below the dam on the Vistula River. (Katarzyna Suska SSIFI).
Reconstructed fishpass chamber. (Pawel Prus SSIFI).
Fishpass on Włocławek dam - attracting current is visible. (Katarzyna Suska SSIFI).
Scanner installed in fishpass chamber. (Pawel Prus SSIFI).
Habitats diversity in the Vistula stretch below the dam – picture taken with the use of drone. (Katarzyna Suska SSIFI).
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Acipenser oxyrinchus, Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Salmo trutta trutta, Vimba vimba, European eel (Anguilla anguilla)
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category more than 1000 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 10461,046 m³/s <br />1,046,000 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2014/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2014/12/31
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Hydropower, Barriers to fish migration
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms, Continuity of sediment transport, Width & depth variation
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Creation of fish passes, Construction of a stabilising stone ramp
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Monitoring system in fish pass


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://amber.international/portfolio-item/the-wloclawek-dam-poland/ All information on this page is copied from The Stanisław Sakowicz Inland Fisheries Institute (SSIFI)

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information

References

Dębowski P (2017). Fish passage through the Włocławek Dam fishway in 2016. Kom. Ryb. 2:1-6. (in Polish with English summary)