Case study:Reppisch: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Riparian planting | |Floodplain / River corridor=Riparian planting | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |Planform / Channel pattern=Channel widening | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 15:21, 1 June 2017
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: none specified
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | |
Country | Switzerland |
Main contact forename | |
Main contact surname | |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Canton of Zurich |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|