Case study:The Upper Raba River Spawning Grounds: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=49.8299678, 19.9583308 }} {{Project overview |Project title=The Upper Raba River Spawning Grounds |Status=I...") |
No edit summary |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=In progress | |Status=In progress | ||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity | |Themes=Habitat and biodiversity | ||
|Country=Poland | |Country=Poland | ||
|Main contact forename= | |Main contact forename=The Upper Raba River Spawning Grounds Project | ||
|Main contact surname= | |Main contact surname=The Upper Raba River Spawning Grounds Project | ||
|Main contact id=Arolam | |||
|Contact organisation url=tarliskagornejraby.pl/news.php | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=The Raba River is located in southern of Poland and is one of the tributaries of the River Vistula. The restoration was carried out as the aim of reinforcing the corridor boundaries without a disturbing the river channel. The objective of the restoration was to increase retention of flood water avoiding regulation and bank reinforcement, conserving the river habitats and their connectivity focusing on river subjectivity, its features and needs in objective to attain a quasi-natural state of the valley. | |||
Steps and progress of the restoration (technical work)? | |||
Erodible corridor on the stem river; Decommissioning of check dams on two tributaries; Monitoring and maintenance of riffles as the features controlling channel conveyance | |||
- Discovered good restoration practices (i.e. techniques, methods, practices)? | |||
Preparation of the guidelines ‘Possible technical and biological interventions in mountain river maintenance’ for river managers | |||
Expected results: | |||
- Changes in hydromorphological, biological or physico-chemical elements of the watercourse after restoration? | |||
Increased habitat heterogeneity in the stem river and tributaries; Enhanced storage of bed material improving the spawning conditions for fish; Re-establishing the longitudinal connectivity of the tributaries; Reduced maximum summer temperatures of the river water; Improved condition of fish populations; Reduced occurrence of invasive alien plant species in the riparian area | |||
- Other results (awareness-raising, land purchase, payment for ecosystem services, etc.)? | |||
Raising the environmental awareness among river managers and local inhabitants; Arresting and reversal of the tendency to channel incision, in the long-term allowing to re-establish the conditions of geomorphic dynamic equilibrium; Increased retention of flood water in the river reach within the erodible corridor; Re-establishing the formation of early successional stages of riparian plant communities | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=NThe Upper Raba River Spawning Groundsn Erosion control by submerged weirs at raba River.JPG | |||
|Caption=The Upper Raba River Spawning Groundsn Erosion control | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=NThe Upper Raba River Spawning Groundsn landscape at raba River.JPG | |||
|Caption=The Upper Raba River Spawning Groundsn landscape | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | |||
|Subcatchment=The Raba River | |||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=The Raba River | |||
|WFD water body name=The Raba River | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=more than 50 m | |||
|Avrg bankfull channel width=60 | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=2 - 5 m | |||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=2.5 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Project started=01/2012 | |||
|Project completed=2016/12/01 | |||
|Total cost category=500 - 1000 k€ | |||
|Funding sources=Swiss Contribution to the Enlarged European Union, Association own sources | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Channel pattern/planform, | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
Line 29: | Line 75: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 36: | Line 80: | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 17:54, 6 September 2013
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Poland |
Main contact forename | The Upper Raba River Spawning Grounds Project |
Main contact surname | The Upper Raba River Spawning Grounds Project |
Main contact user ID | User:Arolam |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | http://tarliskagornejraby.pl/news.php |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Raba River is located in southern of Poland and is one of the tributaries of the River Vistula. The restoration was carried out as the aim of reinforcing the corridor boundaries without a disturbing the river channel. The objective of the restoration was to increase retention of flood water avoiding regulation and bank reinforcement, conserving the river habitats and their connectivity focusing on river subjectivity, its features and needs in objective to attain a quasi-natural state of the valley.
Steps and progress of the restoration (technical work)? Erodible corridor on the stem river; Decommissioning of check dams on two tributaries; Monitoring and maintenance of riffles as the features controlling channel conveyance
- Discovered good restoration practices (i.e. techniques, methods, practices)? Preparation of the guidelines ‘Possible technical and biological interventions in mountain river maintenance’ for river managers
Expected results: - Changes in hydromorphological, biological or physico-chemical elements of the watercourse after restoration? Increased habitat heterogeneity in the stem river and tributaries; Enhanced storage of bed material improving the spawning conditions for fish; Re-establishing the longitudinal connectivity of the tributaries; Reduced maximum summer temperatures of the river water; Improved condition of fish populations; Reduced occurrence of invasive alien plant species in the riparian area - Other results (awareness-raising, land purchase, payment for ecosystem services, etc.)? Raising the environmental awareness among river managers and local inhabitants; Arresting and reversal of the tendency to channel incision, in the long-term allowing to re-establish the conditions of geomorphic dynamic equilibrium; Increased retention of flood water in the river reach within the erodible corridor; Re-establishing the formation of early successional stages of riparian plant communities
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|