Case study:Water of Dye Fish Pass Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 13: Line 13:
|Main contact id=NickRRC
|Main contact id=NickRRC
|Contact organisation=River Restoration Centre
|Contact organisation=River Restoration Centre
|Partner organisations=River Dee Trust,  
|Partner organisations=River Dee Trust,
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=WaterofDye.png
|Picture description=River Dee Trust fish passage easement through two manmade obstructions on the Water of Dye (works in 2008).
|Project summary=The Water of Dye is a tributary of the Water of Feugh - itself a tributary of the River Dee. 15km along the 26km length of the Dye are two weirs - the upper acting as a partial impoundment to supply a nearby drinking water storage reservoir and the lower Crump weir acting as a flow accelerator for flow monitoring purposes.
Fisheries surveys conducted between 1997 and 2006 showed that the weirs were acting as significant barriers to upstream Atlantic salmon migration - cutting off 11km of good spawning and nursery habitat.
In 2008, two fish passes were installed on the two weirs. This initially involved constructing pre-weirs below the pre-existing weir structures, in order to raise tailwater levels to ease fish passage. In addition, the upper weir also had a 'step-pool' pass installed, as the weir was deemed to be particularly steep for fish passage. This allowed to fish to climb the weir in two 'jumps'.
In order to determine the ecological success of the project, the River Dee Trust conducted pre/post-restoration electro-fishing surveys, to track any changes in fish abundance above and below the weirs. These surveys determined the following:
- Statistically significant increase in salmon parr above the weir in 2010 and 2011, compared with pre-restoration baseline.
- In 2011, salmon parr numbers u/s of weir were found to be not statistically different to abundances d/s for the first time - indicating that the fish pass had been successful in promoting free u/s passage for spawning.
- Decline in trout fry and parr above weir following fish pass installation, however the control site d/s showed no significant decline. Possibly due to outcompetition for habitat and territory by salmon, which are naturally far more suited to the habitat.  A similar issue was seen following fish pass installation on the Tweed.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Water of Dye
|Subcatchment=Water of Dye
Line 36: Line 56:
|Monitoring Lead organisation=River Dee Trust
|Monitoring Lead organisation=River Dee Trust
}}
}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations
{{Measures}}
|Specific mitigation=Barriers to fish migration,
|Biological quality elements=Fish,
}}
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Weir modification,
|Other technical measure=Creation of fish passes,
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=Fish
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=Yes
|Result=Improvement
}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
Line 48: Line 83:
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references
|Link=www.riverdee.org.uk/FileLibrary/Content/Publications/2012%20Survey%20Bulletin_Dye%20fish%20passes.pdf
|Description=River Dee Trust - 2012 Bulletin
}}
{{Additional links and references
|Link=www.riverdee.org.uk/FileLibrary/Content/Publications/Dye%20fish%20passes%202011_%20survey%20bulletin.pdf
|Description=River Dee Trust - 2011 Bulletin
}}
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 15:03, 2 January 2019

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 56° 56' 22.97" N, 2° 37' 41.45" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries
Country Scotland
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID User:NickRRC
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations River Dee Trust
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
River Dee Trust fish passage easement through two manmade obstructions on the Water of Dye (works in 2008).

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Water of Dye is a tributary of the Water of Feugh - itself a tributary of the River Dee. 15km along the 26km length of the Dye are two weirs - the upper acting as a partial impoundment to supply a nearby drinking water storage reservoir and the lower Crump weir acting as a flow accelerator for flow monitoring purposes.

Fisheries surveys conducted between 1997 and 2006 showed that the weirs were acting as significant barriers to upstream Atlantic salmon migration - cutting off 11km of good spawning and nursery habitat.

In 2008, two fish passes were installed on the two weirs. This initially involved constructing pre-weirs below the pre-existing weir structures, in order to raise tailwater levels to ease fish passage. In addition, the upper weir also had a 'step-pool' pass installed, as the weir was deemed to be particularly steep for fish passage. This allowed to fish to climb the weir in two 'jumps'.

In order to determine the ecological success of the project, the River Dee Trust conducted pre/post-restoration electro-fishing surveys, to track any changes in fish abundance above and below the weirs. These surveys determined the following:

- Statistically significant increase in salmon parr above the weir in 2010 and 2011, compared with pre-restoration baseline.

- In 2011, salmon parr numbers u/s of weir were found to be not statistically different to abundances d/s for the first time - indicating that the fish pass had been successful in promoting free u/s passage for spawning.

- Decline in trout fry and parr above weir following fish pass installation, however the control site d/s showed no significant decline. Possibly due to outcompetition for habitat and territory by salmon, which are naturally far more suited to the habitat. A similar issue was seen following fish pass installation on the Tweed.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district North East Scotland
River basin Dee

Subcatchment

River name Water of Dye
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 500 - 1000 m
Maximum altitude (m) 778778 m <br />0.778 km <br />77,800 cm <br />
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover Upland Moorland/Grassland
Waterbody ID



Site

Name Water of Dye
WFD water body codes 23329
WFD (national) typology Small, Mid, Organic
WFD water body name Water of Dye - upper catchment
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Salmon, brown/sea trout
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Peat/Bedrock
River corridor land use Pasture
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2008
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Life-Nature Conservation of Atlantic Salmon in Scotland

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring River Dee Trust



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Weir modification
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other Creation of fish passes
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes Yes No Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.riverdee.org.uk/FileLibrary/Content/Publications/2012%20Survey%20Bulletin Dye%20fish%20passes.pdf River Dee Trust - 2012 Bulletin
http://www.riverdee.org.uk/FileLibrary/Content/Publications/Dye%20fish%20passes%202011 %20survey%20bulletin.pdf River Dee Trust - 2011 Bulletin

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information