Case study:Marsh restoration on the Merlue: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
|Location=
|Location=46.50444, 5.635358999999951
   
}}
   
{{Project overview
     
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity
|Country=France
|Main contact forename=Eric
|Main contact surname=Chaput
|Contact organisation=Association pour le développement et l’animation de la Petite Montagne
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=4.IMG 3735-bis.JPG
|Project summary=The Merlue is a 7,9 km long tributary of the Valouse, with a small watershed (less than 15 km2) half covered by managed forests, half by non (or little) fertilized grassland. The fish population is mainly composed of two species : brown trout and bullhead (Cottus gobio). The invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) is also present. In its middle stretch, the Merlue used to cross a marsh, however more than one century ago, the riverbed was moved to the edge of the marsh in order to drain the land and plant softwood (which has never been productive). The new configuration affected the summer connection with the groundwater table. This explains both the frequency of drying up and the overheating of a portion of the river, two phenomena that are not observed downstream from the marsh, where the Merlue is in its original bed.
In the lower stretch, the riverbed was enlarged by approximately five meters, resulting in shallow waters and reduced available habitat for aquatic wildlife.
The Merlue is part of the Natura 2000 site “Petite montagne du Jura”. Restoration actions were carried out within the LIFE project “Ruisseaux de têtes de bassins et faune patrimoniale associée” (LIFE 04NAT/FR/000082), focusing on restoring the population of native white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes.
Before the works , 19,4 hectares were acquired in the marsh, thanks to the intervention of the “property development and rural settlement society” ( SAFER) . Four hectares of invasive willows and undesirable tree species were removed. The old riverbed was found by infrared photography , since the analysis of land registers did not allow to locate it. The stream was moved where the former bed was and the rectified channel was filled. The new riverbed was only slightly excavated and was intentionally undersized (30 x 30 cm), so that it would naturally recreate its shape. Some ramps were was positioned under the bed where specific anthropogenic constraints (bridge, crossing for agricultural machinery , etc. ) did not allow a free dynamics. 
In the downstream portion, softwoods were removed . The riverbed of the Merlue was narrowed and raised by 50 cm adding sediments excavated in the nearby village (for the foundation of a house), and arranged in order to recreate a sinuous low-flow channel and a sequence of riffles and pools.
The stretch ends with a drowned rock ramp, positioned at the same height as the current bottom of the riverbed .
 
 
|Monitoring surveys and results=The project allowed to increase by 300 m the stream length and to raise the water level along 1 500 m. Ten hectares of wetlands have been restored, which are also a relevant flood storage area. Habitats diversity and functionality were increased and initial monitoring results are encouraging, however it is too early to assess the biological gains of the operation.
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=1.PICT0362.JPG
|Caption=The Merlue just downstream the marsh in summer 2009. The bed moved [on the left] on the edge of the marsh [on the right] has been filled during the restoration works.
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=2.IMG 5871.JPG
|Caption= Uprooting and burning of willows present in the marsh during the summer of 2008.
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=3.DSCN0049bis.JPG
|Caption=The new riverbed slightly excavated.
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=5.DSCF0027.JPG
|Caption=The Merlue in the restored area during the winter 2008-2009. In the foreground, we can see a stone structure put in place in order to raise and narrow the riverbed.
}}
}}
{{Project_overview
{{Case study image
|Status=
|File name=4.IMG 3735-bis.JPG
   
|Caption=First flood in autumn 2008 in the marsh, after its restoration.
   
      Complete
|Project web site url=
     
|Themes=
      Habitat and biodiversity
|Country=
      France
|Main contact forename=
      Eric
|Main contact surname=
      Chaput
|Main contact id=
     
|Contact organisation=
      Association pour le développement et l’animation de la Petite Montagne
|Contact organisation url=
     
|Partner organisations=
     
|Multi-site=
     
|Name of parent multi-site project=
     
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=Merlue
   
   
      Hake
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
Line 102: Line 101:
        
        
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Reach length directly affected=1450 m
   
|Project started=2008/07/01
   
|Works started=2008/07/01
      1450 m
|Works completed=2008/09/01
|Project started=
|Total cost category=100 - 500 k€
      2008/07/01
|Total1 cost=136 k€
|Works started=
|Funding sources=EU LIFE Programme,
      2008/07/01
|Invst and design cost=24.5
|Works completed=
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Parc naturel régional du Morvan, Office national de l’eau et des milieux aquatiques (Onema), université de Franche Comté.
      2008/09/01
|Wrk and supervision cost=52
|Project completed=
|Supplementary funding information=26,000 € for land expropriation
     
|Total cost category=
      100 - 500 k€
|Total1 cost=
      136 k€
|Funding sources=
      LIFE Streams
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
Line 189: Line 129:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Floodplain / River corridor=Restoration of riparian marshes
   
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel widening,
   
}}
      Increase in bed width
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
|Floodplain / River corridor=
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row
      Restoration of riparian marshes
|Monitored before=No
|Planform / Channel pattern=
|Monitored after=No
     
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Other technical measure=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Biological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=Fish
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes
|Control site used=No
|Result=Awaiting results
}}
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=Invertebrates
|Monitored before=Yes
|Monitored after=No
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Quantitative monitoring=No
|Control site used=No
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}}
Line 216: Line 166:
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Case study documents
|File name=28 3 rex r8-merlue vbat.pdf
|Description=Case study description by ONEMA (French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments) (in French)
}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}}
{{Additional_links_and_references_header}}

Latest revision as of 15:12, 2 January 2019

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 46° 30' 15.98" N, 5° 38' 7.29" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country France
Main contact forename Eric
Main contact surname Chaput
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Association pour le développement et l’animation de la Petite Montagne
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Merlue is a 7,9 km long tributary of the Valouse, with a small watershed (less than 15 km2) half covered by managed forests, half by non (or little) fertilized grassland. The fish population is mainly composed of two species : brown trout and bullhead (Cottus gobio). The invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) is also present. In its middle stretch, the Merlue used to cross a marsh, however more than one century ago, the riverbed was moved to the edge of the marsh in order to drain the land and plant softwood (which has never been productive). The new configuration affected the summer connection with the groundwater table. This explains both the frequency of drying up and the overheating of a portion of the river, two phenomena that are not observed downstream from the marsh, where the Merlue is in its original bed. In the lower stretch, the riverbed was enlarged by approximately five meters, resulting in shallow waters and reduced available habitat for aquatic wildlife. The Merlue is part of the Natura 2000 site “Petite montagne du Jura”. Restoration actions were carried out within the LIFE project “Ruisseaux de têtes de bassins et faune patrimoniale associée” (LIFE 04NAT/FR/000082), focusing on restoring the population of native white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes. Before the works , 19,4 hectares were acquired in the marsh, thanks to the intervention of the “property development and rural settlement society” ( SAFER) . Four hectares of invasive willows and undesirable tree species were removed. The old riverbed was found by infrared photography , since the analysis of land registers did not allow to locate it. The stream was moved where the former bed was and the rectified channel was filled. The new riverbed was only slightly excavated and was intentionally undersized (30 x 30 cm), so that it would naturally recreate its shape. Some ramps were was positioned under the bed where specific anthropogenic constraints (bridge, crossing for agricultural machinery , etc. ) did not allow a free dynamics. In the downstream portion, softwoods were removed . The riverbed of the Merlue was narrowed and raised by 50 cm adding sediments excavated in the nearby village (for the foundation of a house), and arranged in order to recreate a sinuous low-flow channel and a sequence of riffles and pools. The stretch ends with a drowned rock ramp, positioned at the same height as the current bottom of the riverbed .

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The project allowed to increase by 300 m the stream length and to raise the water level along 1 500 m. Ten hectares of wetlands have been restored, which are also a relevant flood storage area. Habitats diversity and functionality were increased and initial monitoring results are encouraging, however it is too early to assess the biological gains of the operation.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


The Merlue just downstream the marsh in summer 2009. The bed moved [on the left] on the edge of the marsh [on the right] has been filled during the restoration works.
Uprooting and burning of willows present in the marsh during the summer of 2008.
The new riverbed slightly excavated.
The Merlue in the restored area during the winter 2008-2009. In the foreground, we can see a stone structure put in place in order to raise and narrow the riverbed.
First flood in autumn 2008 in the marsh, after its restoration.
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Rhône - Méditerranée
River basin Rhône-Mediterranean

Subcatchment

River name Merlue
Area category
Area (km2) 1212 km² <br />1,200 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Western Highlands
Dominant land cover Plantation forestry, Grassland
Waterbody ID



Site

Name Merlue
WFD water body codes FRDR493a
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Single channel, Straight
Reference morphology Single channel, Sinuous, Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Groundwater
Dominant substrate Cobble, Gravel
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 33 m <br />0.003 km <br />300 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 11 m³/s <br />1,000 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 1450 m1.45 km <br />145,000 cm <br />
Project started 2008/07/01
Works started 2008/07/01
Works completed 2008/09/01
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 136 k€136,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources EU LIFE Programme

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 24.524.5 k€ <br />24,500 € <br /> Parc naturel régional du Morvan, Office national de l’eau et des milieux aquatiques (Onema), université de Franche Comté.
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision 5252 k€ <br />52,000 € <br />
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring

Supplementary funding information

26,000 € for land expropriation



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Structure & condition of riparian zones, Width & depth variation
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Restoration of riparian marshes
Planform / Channel pattern Channel widening
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]] No No No No No

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes Yes No Yes No Awaiting results
Invertebrates Yes No No No No

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information