Case study:Hurdalselva - River Hurdalselv: Difference between revisions
SFW Nikhil (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|Reach length directly affected=1100 | |Reach length directly affected=1100 | ||
|Total1 cost=32 | |Total1 cost=32 | ||
|Funding sources=Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), private funding, | |Funding sources=Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), private funding, Local fishing associations, | ||
|Invst and design cost=5 | |Invst and design cost=5 | ||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=NJFF-Akershus | |Investigation and design Lead organisation=NJFF-Akershus | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|Wrk and supervision cost=26 | |Wrk and supervision cost=26 | ||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=NVE | |Works and supervision Lead organisation=NVE | ||
|Supplementary funding information=This was..... | |Supplementary funding information=This was..... | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations |
Latest revision as of 13:32, 1 November 2018
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Bjørn Otto |
Main contact surname | Dønnum |
Main contact user ID | User:Arolam |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationThis was.....
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information The works in this particular river stretch was initiated to test different restoration techniques in a rather high gradient river (part of the river section has a gradient of 1,5%). Two days after completion of the in-river works, a large flood (estimated to be a 1:50-year return flood) destroyed part of the constructions. Not very encouraging for the local angling club, because the project was meant to be part of a larger project. Funding however stopped after the trial, and there has not been any attempt to restart the project.
|