Case study:River Dulais Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(25 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity | |Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity | ||
|Country=Wales | |Country=Wales | ||
|Main contact forename= | |Main contact forename=Richard | ||
|Main contact surname= | |Main contact surname=Edwards | ||
|Contact organisation=River | |Contact organisation=Salix River & Wetland Services Limited | ||
|Partner organisations=Natural Resources Wales, | |||
|Partner organisations= | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=The River Dulais is | |Project picture=Fig 5 - River Dulais one year after completion .JPG | ||
|Picture description=River Dulais one year after restoration works completed. Courtesy of RRC | |||
|Project summary=The River Dulais (Afon Dulais) is a tributary of the River Towy, and is an important spawning habitat for migratory fish. The river had a history of instability and planform adjustment. Unrestricted grazing, by sheep and cattle, had resulted in a loss of bankside vegetation. 4.9 km of the catchment had been fenced, however some areas needed more extensive bank protection. | |||
Root wads were installed into the bank as an alternative to blockstone. In areas where the channel had additional capacity to scour or degrade brushwood protection was also used in between root wads. Careful thought was given to creating a smooth profile along the bank to reduce the risk of erosion. The riverbank above each root wad was protected by erosion control matting. | |||
Forty root wads were installed over eighty metres of bank, with two to three metres of trunk left attached to the root wad. Crack willow (Salix fragilis), grey willow (Salix cinerea) and white willow (Salix alba) with an average trunk diameter of between 30cm and 60cm were used. Live willow was chosen as each tree should root and shoot to quickly bind the surrounding bank. All trees were sourced from within the Dulais catchment and two adjacent river valleys. | |||
Since installation stabilisation of a complex outer meander bend has been achieved and each of the root wads installed has grown well. | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Rootward excavator.jpg | |||
|Caption=Root wad being installed in the bank | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Before dualis.jpg | |||
|Caption=Dulais before restoration (2003) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=After dulais.jpg | |||
|Caption=Dulais after restoration (2005) | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | |||
|Subcatchment=Dulais - conf with Ddu to confluence with Tywi | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name=River Dulais | |Name=River Dulais | ||
Line 27: | Line 47: | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=No | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|Average channel gradient category=0.01 - 0.1 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=500 m | |||
|Project started=2004/05/01 | |||
|Project completed=2004/05/31 | |||
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€ | |||
|Total1 cost=33 k€ | |||
|Wrk and supervision cost=33 | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Salix | |||
|Supplementary funding information=Works split into €20k for revetment work and €13k for fencing | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Channel pattern/planform, Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones, | |||
|Biological quality elements=Lack of vegetation, Macrophytes, | |||
|Other motivation=Promote soft-engineering/river restoration techniques | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank stabilisation, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland, Vegetation management, | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel narrowing, | |||
|Management interventions=Fencing, | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
Line 41: | Line 80: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
{{Additional links and references header}} | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=www.therrc.co.uk/case_studies/rrn%20issue%2023.pdf | |||
|Description=River Restoration Centre news article | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information | ||
|Information=Monitoring encompassed HABSCORE and electro fishing surveys, which were undertaken by the Environment Agency Wales just after construction in 2004 and again in 2006. Three sites were surveyed within the project reach, and a further three upstream to act as controls. At each site two semi-quantitative and one quantitative electro fishing surveys were carried out to determine population estimates for salmon and trout fry and parr. | |||
No marked differences were observed in fish densities between the two survey occasions, with some sites showing a reduction in fish numbers. However, it should be noted that the post-scheme surveys were undertaken just one year after the works, with the full benefits not likely to be realised until several years after implementation. | |||
Where flow is focussed directly at the root wads, an area of localised scour has formed under the base of the exposed root ball. This provides an overhanging vegetated bank, which is a valuable new habitat feature. | |||
Diverse bankside cover has resulted and cleaner gravels are present, with visibly less fine sediment. Overall the channel geometry is now similar to more well-vegetated reaches of the river. | |||
Due to its rural and over-wide location maintenance of flow conveyance was not deemed to be an issue, even with the very fast growth rate of willow no post-project maintenance (coppicing) was required. | |||
}} | |||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 09:19, 2 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Wales |
Main contact forename | Richard |
Main contact surname | Edwards |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Salix River & Wetland Services Limited |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | Natural Resources Wales |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The River Dulais (Afon Dulais) is a tributary of the River Towy, and is an important spawning habitat for migratory fish. The river had a history of instability and planform adjustment. Unrestricted grazing, by sheep and cattle, had resulted in a loss of bankside vegetation. 4.9 km of the catchment had been fenced, however some areas needed more extensive bank protection.
Root wads were installed into the bank as an alternative to blockstone. In areas where the channel had additional capacity to scour or degrade brushwood protection was also used in between root wads. Careful thought was given to creating a smooth profile along the bank to reduce the risk of erosion. The riverbank above each root wad was protected by erosion control matting.
Forty root wads were installed over eighty metres of bank, with two to three metres of trunk left attached to the root wad. Crack willow (Salix fragilis), grey willow (Salix cinerea) and white willow (Salix alba) with an average trunk diameter of between 30cm and 60cm were used. Live willow was chosen as each tree should root and shoot to quickly bind the surrounding bank. All trees were sourced from within the Dulais catchment and two adjacent river valleys.
Since installation stabilisation of a complex outer meander bend has been achieved and each of the root wads installed has grown well.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationWorks split into €20k for revetment work and €13k for fencing
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information Monitoring encompassed HABSCORE and electro fishing surveys, which were undertaken by the Environment Agency Wales just after construction in 2004 and again in 2006. Three sites were surveyed within the project reach, and a further three upstream to act as controls. At each site two semi-quantitative and one quantitative electro fishing surveys were carried out to determine population estimates for salmon and trout fry and parr. No marked differences were observed in fish densities between the two survey occasions, with some sites showing a reduction in fish numbers. However, it should be noted that the post-scheme surveys were undertaken just one year after the works, with the full benefits not likely to be realised until several years after implementation. Where flow is focussed directly at the root wads, an area of localised scour has formed under the base of the exposed root ball. This provides an overhanging vegetated bank, which is a valuable new habitat feature. Diverse bankside cover has resulted and cleaner gravels are present, with visibly less fine sediment. Overall the channel geometry is now similar to more well-vegetated reaches of the river. Due to its rural and over-wide location maintenance of flow conveyance was not deemed to be an issue, even with the very fast growth rate of willow no post-project maintenance (coppicing) was required.
|