Case study:Blauwe Kamer: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|Project summary=The Blauwe Kamer (Blue Room, named after a farm that stood in the area) was one of the first projects, in 1992, in line with the ideas of Plan Ooievaar (http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Ooievaar, Dutch), which can be seen as a predecessor for the Room for the River program. | |Project summary=The Blauwe Kamer (Blue Room, named after a farm that stood in the area) was one of the first projects, in 1992, in line with the ideas of Plan Ooievaar (http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Ooievaar, Dutch), which can be seen as a predecessor for the Room for the River program. | ||
The first measure that was taken was to | The first measure that was taken was to take away part of the summer quay, restoring the natural dynamics of the floodplain, thereby bringing back the natural river landscape. The low-lying area now becomes inundated even with a slight increase of the water level. This, together with the introduction of large herbivores, konik horses and galloway cattle, has led to the emergence of a more diverse landscape. | ||
In 2002 the Grebbeberg, the south side of the Utrecht Hill Ridge is connected to the Blauwe Kamer. As part of the National Ecological Network is the Blauwe Kamer part of a project where the Utrecht Ridge, the Veluwe and the river banks of the Meuse and Waal get connected with each other. For this purpose a number of barriers such as the N225 provincial road still need to be resolved. | In 2002 the Grebbeberg, the south side of the Utrecht Hill Ridge is connected to the Blauwe Kamer. As part of the National Ecological Network is the Blauwe Kamer part of a project where the Utrecht Ridge, the Veluwe and the river banks of the Meuse and Waal get connected with each other. For this purpose a number of barriers such as the N225 provincial road still need to be resolved. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Rhine | |Subcatchment=Rhine | ||
Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name=Blauwe Kamer | |Name=Blauwe Kamer | ||
|WFD (national) typology=R7, | |WFD (national) typology=R7, | ||
|WFD water body name=Lower Rhine | |WFD water body name=Lower Rhine | ||
|Pre-project morphology=Plane bed, | |Pre-project morphology=Plane bed, | ||
|Reference morphology=Low gradient passively meandering, | |Reference morphology=Low gradient passively meandering, | ||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |Heavily modified water body=Yes | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=No | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|Species=Coypu (Myocastor coypus) | |Species=Coypu (Myocastor coypus) | ||
|Dominant hydrology=Artificially regulated, | |||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, | |||
|River corridor land use=Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=5 - 10 m | |||
|Avrg bankfull channel width=300 | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=5 - 10 m | |||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=8 | |||
|Mean discharge category=more than 1000 m³/s | |||
|Mn discharge=2000 | |||
|Average channel gradient category=Less than 0.001 | |||
|Avrg channel gradient=0.00001 | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
Line 47: | Line 62: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 54: | Line 67: | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 07:10, 6 September 2013
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Rogier |
Main contact surname | Vogelij |
Main contact user ID | User:InfoMan |
Contact organisation | Utrechts Landschap |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.utrechtslandschap.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Blauwe Kamer (Blue Room, named after a farm that stood in the area) was one of the first projects, in 1992, in line with the ideas of Plan Ooievaar (http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Ooievaar, Dutch), which can be seen as a predecessor for the Room for the River program.
The first measure that was taken was to take away part of the summer quay, restoring the natural dynamics of the floodplain, thereby bringing back the natural river landscape. The low-lying area now becomes inundated even with a slight increase of the water level. This, together with the introduction of large herbivores, konik horses and galloway cattle, has led to the emergence of a more diverse landscape. In 2002 the Grebbeberg, the south side of the Utrecht Hill Ridge is connected to the Blauwe Kamer. As part of the National Ecological Network is the Blauwe Kamer part of a project where the Utrecht Ridge, the Veluwe and the river banks of the Meuse and Waal get connected with each other. For this purpose a number of barriers such as the N225 provincial road still need to be resolved.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Amerongse Bovenpolder, Bakenhof Dyke reconstruction, Room for the River, Ruppoldingen, Upper Main catchment restoration
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|