Case study:Odder Stream Restoration: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
(7) 6 hectares of seepage wetlands from removing drains; and | (7) 6 hectares of seepage wetlands from removing drains; and | ||
(8) Area is fenced to allow grazing over entire area – special agreements between land owners. | (8) Area is fenced to allow grazing over entire area – special agreements between land owners. | ||
The River Restoration Centre would like to thank Matthew William Cochran, from ORBICON, for providing the information and photographs for this case study. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} |
Revision as of 11:06, 20 March 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture |
Country | Denmark |
Main contact forename | Matthew William |
Main contact surname | Cochran |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | ORBICON |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.orbicon.com |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This project aimed to:
(1) Remove 480 kg P per year – equals ¾ of the total Phosphorus loading to Kul Lake; (2) Remove 18 tons N per year or 114 kg/N/ha per year; (3) Stoppage of vegetation cutting and dredging; (4) Removal of all dams/weirs in the entire watershed; (5) Ensure habitat for the orchid Coralroot (Corallorhiza trifida) and Western marsh orchid (Dactylorhiza majalis; (6) Improve habitat for the European brook lamprey (Lampetra planeri) and Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra; and (7) Open the area to the public for recreation – 37 km of trials.
The restoration activities in the first 65 hectares included:
(1) Restoring 1.3 km of stream; (2) Raised the stream bed 50 – 80 cm; (3) Crushed/removed 25 drain systems and 7 ditches; (4) Spawning grounds every 20 meters in the stream – 650 m3 gravel; (5) 15.2 hectares of permanent/semi-permanent wetlands; (6) 8.5 hectares of seasonally flooded wetlands; (7) 6 hectares of seepage wetlands from removing drains; and (8) Area is fenced to allow grazing over entire area – special agreements between land owners.
The River Restoration Centre would like to thank Matthew William Cochran, from ORBICON, for providing the information and photographs for this case study.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Name | |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | |
Invasive species present | |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | 2,975.814632,975.815 k€ <br />2,975,814.63 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries; Vejle Kommune |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Supplementary funding information
Costs 10,840,000 Danish Kroners ( ,971,000 million) support from the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries 250,000 DKK (,500) support from Vejle Kommune 11,090,000 DKK (,016,000)
Archaeology survey – 23,000 DKK (,000) Construction costs – 1,925,000 DKK (0,000) Administrative costs – 26,000 DKK (,000) Compensation to landowners – 7,875,000 DKK ( ,430,000) Maintenance of wetland area (grazing) – 985,000 DKK (0,000) Design and consulting services – 250,000 DKK (,500)
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information