Case study:Odder Stream Restoration: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Project summary=This project aimed to: | |Project summary=This project aimed to: | ||
1 | (1) Remove 480 kg P per year – equals ¾ of the total Phosphorus loading to Kul Lake; | ||
2 | (2) Remove 18 tons N per year or 114 kg/N/ha per year; | ||
3 | (3) Stoppage of vegetation cutting and dredging; | ||
4 | (4) Removal of all dams/weirs in the entire watershed; | ||
5 | (5) Ensure habitat for the orchid Coralroot (Corallorhiza trifida) and Western marsh orchid (Dactylorhiza majalis; | ||
6 | (6) Improve habitat for the European brook lamprey (Lampetra planeri) and Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra; and | ||
7 | (7) Open the area to the public for recreation – 37 km of trials. | ||
The restoration activities in the first 65 hectares included: | The restoration activities in the first 65 hectares included: | ||
1 | (1) Restoring 1.3 km of stream | ||
2 | (2) Raised the stream bed 50 – 80 cm | ||
3 | (3) Crushed/removed 25 drain systems and 7 ditches | ||
4 | (4) Spawning grounds every 20 meters in the stream – 650 m3 gravel | ||
5 | (5) 15.2 hectares of permanent/semi-permanent wetlands | ||
6 | (6) 8.5 hectares of seasonally flooded wetlands | ||
7 | (7) 6 hectares of seepage wetlands from removing drains | ||
8 | (8) Area is fenced to allow grazing over entire area – special agreements between land owners | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} |
Revision as of 10:49, 20 March 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture |
Country | Denmark |
Main contact forename | Matthew William |
Main contact surname | Cochran |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | ORBICON |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.orbicon.com |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
This project aimed to:
(1) Remove 480 kg P per year – equals ¾ of the total Phosphorus loading to Kul Lake; (2) Remove 18 tons N per year or 114 kg/N/ha per year; (3) Stoppage of vegetation cutting and dredging; (4) Removal of all dams/weirs in the entire watershed; (5) Ensure habitat for the orchid Coralroot (Corallorhiza trifida) and Western marsh orchid (Dactylorhiza majalis; (6) Improve habitat for the European brook lamprey (Lampetra planeri) and Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra; and (7) Open the area to the public for recreation – 37 km of trials.
The restoration activities in the first 65 hectares included:
(1) Restoring 1.3 km of stream (2) Raised the stream bed 50 – 80 cm (3) Crushed/removed 25 drain systems and 7 ditches (4) Spawning grounds every 20 meters in the stream – 650 m3 gravel (5) 15.2 hectares of permanent/semi-permanent wetlands (6) 8.5 hectares of seasonally flooded wetlands (7) 6 hectares of seepage wetlands from removing drains (8) Area is fenced to allow grazing over entire area – special agreements between land owners
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Name | |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | |
Invasive species present | |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | 2,975.814632,975.815 k€ <br />2,975,814.63 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries; Vejle Kommune |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Supplementary funding information
Costs 10,840,000 Danish Kroners ( ,971,000 million) support from the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries 250,000 DKK (,500) support from Vejle Kommune 11,090,000 DKK (,016,000)
Archaeology survey – 23,000 DKK (,000) Construction costs – 1,925,000 DKK (0,000) Administrative costs – 26,000 DKK (,000) Compensation to landowners – 7,875,000 DKK ( ,430,000) Maintenance of wetland area (grazing) – 985,000 DKK (0,000) Design and consulting services – 250,000 DKK (,500)
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information