Case study:Odder Stream Restoration: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.orbicon.com | |Contact organisation url=www.orbicon.com | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Goals | |Project summary=Goals | ||
• Remove 480 kg P per year – equals ¾ of the total Phosphorus loading to Kul Lake | • Remove 480 kg P per year – equals ¾ of the total Phosphorus loading to Kul Lake |
Revision as of 10:36, 20 March 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture |
Country | Denmark |
Main contact forename | Matthew William |
Main contact surname | Cochran |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | ORBICON |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.orbicon.com |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Goals
• Remove 480 kg P per year – equals ¾ of the total Phosphorus loading to Kul Lake
• Remove 18 tons N per year or 114 kg/N/ha. Per year
• Stoppage of vegetation cutting and dredging
• Removal of all dams/weirs in the entire watershed
• Ensure habitat for the orchid Coralroot (Corallorhiza trifida) and Western marsh orchid (Dactylorhiza majalis)
• Improve habitat for the European brook lamprey (Lampetra planeri) and Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra)
• Open the area to the public for recreation – 37 km of trials
Restoration activities in the first 65 hectares Restoring 1.3 km of stream Raised the stream bed 50 – 80 cm Crushed/removed 25 drain systems and 7 ditches Spawning grounds every 20 meters in the stream – 650 m3 gravel 15.2 hectares of permanent/semi-permanent wetlands 8.5 hectares of seasonally flooded wetlands 6 hectares of seepage wetlands from removing drains Area is fenced to allow grazing over entire area – special agreements between land owners
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Name | |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | |
Invasive species present | |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | 2,975.814632,975.815 k€ <br />2,975,814.63 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries; Vejle Kommune |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Supplementary funding information
Costs 10,840,000 Danish Kroners ( ,971,000 million) support from the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries 250,000 DKK (,500) support from Vejle Kommune 11,090,000 DKK (,016,000)
Archaeology survey – 23,000 DKK (,000) Construction costs – 1,925,000 DKK (0,000) Administrative costs – 26,000 DKK (,000) Compensation to landowners – 7,875,000 DKK ( ,430,000) Maintenance of wetland area (grazing) – 985,000 DKK (0,000) Design and consulting services – 250,000 DKK (,500)
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information