Case study:Rio Tepice urban restoration: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
Line 190: Line 190:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=embankement renaturalization
   
|Floodplain / River corridor=Riparian tree planting
   
|Management interventions=Management of paths
      embankement renaturalization
|Social measures=Public green area building
|Floodplain / River corridor=
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Participation in monitoring
      Riparian tree planting
|Planform / Channel pattern=
     
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
      Management of paths
|Social measures=
      Pubblic green area building
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
      Participation in monitoring
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}

Revision as of 16:34, 23 January 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 45° 0' 15.84" N, 7° 29' 24.00" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country Italy
Main contact forename Guido
Main contact surname Blanchard
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Studio Blanchard-Gallo
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Po
River basin Po Piemontese

Subcatchment

River name Tepice
Area category 10 - 100 km²
Area (km2) 15 km²1,500 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 500 - 1000 m
Maximum altitude (m) 660 m0.66 km <br />66,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology Calcareous, Mixture
Ecoregion Italy and Corsica
Dominant land cover Urban, Woodland
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Rio Tepice in Chieri
WFD water body codes 0010941pi
WFD (national) typology 06SS2T
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Single channel, High width:depth
Reference morphology Pool-riffle
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Cobble
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category Less than 2 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 1.51.5 m³/s <br />1,500 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient 0.013
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 250 m0.25 km <br />25,000 cm <br />
Project started 1993/03/01
Works started 1996/05/01
Works completed 1997/12/01
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 123 k€123,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Piermonte region, Chieri municiplaity

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 1 - 10 k€ 7 k€7,000 € <br /> Studio Blanchard-Gallo Guido Blanchard
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision 100 - 500 k€ Studio Blanchard-Gallo Guido Blanchard
Post-project management and maintenance 10 - 50 k€ Chieri municiplaity
Monitoring “Il tuo Parco” association Luca Bruno



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform
Biology
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications embankement renaturalization
Floodplain / River corridor Riparian tree planting
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Management of paths
Social measures (incl. engagement) Public green area building
Other Participation in monitoring


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Structure & condition of riparian zones Yes Yes Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Ex ante status "Il Rio Tepice nel suo Viaggio verso il Po" Ass. Il tuo Parco


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information