Case study:Restoration of Szárazerdei river branch: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
Line 54: Line 54:
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|Name=Dunakiliti
   
|WFD water body code=AEP443
   
|Pre-project morphology=Sinuous,Decreased water supply, high macrophyte coverage,Oxbow
      Dunakiliti
|Reference morphology=Braided,Sidearm
|WFD water body code=
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
      AEP443
|Site designation=EU - Special Protected Area
|WFD (national) typology=
|Protected species present=No
     
|Invasive species present=No
|WFD water body name=
|Dominant hydrology=Permanent lentic
     
|Dominant substrate=Gravel,Silt
|Pre-project morphology=
|River corridor land use=Woodland,Wetland
      Sinuous,Decreased water supply, high macrophyte coverage,Oxbow
|Average bankfull channel width category=more than 50 m
|Reference morphology=
|Average bankfull channel depth category=5 - 10 m
      Braided,Sidearm
|Heavily modified water body=
      true
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
      EU - Special Protected Area
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
      Permanent lentic
|Dominant substrate=
      Gravel,Silt
|River corridor land use=
      Woodland,Wetland
|Average bankfull channel width category=
      more than 50 m
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
      5 - 10 m
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
      Artificially controlled - altering
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project_background

Revision as of 09:52, 19 December 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 47° 58' 30.59" N, 17° 17' 56.18" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Hungary
Main contact forename Emil
Main contact surname Janák
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation North-Transdanubian Water Management Directorate titkarsag@edukovizig.hu
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Danube River Basin District
River basin Danube

Subcatchment

River name Sziget-köz
Area category more than 10000 km²
Area (km2) 120000 km²12,000,000 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Hungarian Lowlands
Dominant land cover Wetland, Woodland
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Dunakiliti
WFD water body codes AEP443
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Sinuous, Decreased water supply, high macrophyte coverage, Oxbow
Reference morphology Braided, Sidearm
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation EU - Special Protected Area
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Permanent lentic
Dominant substrate Gravel, Silt
River corridor land use Woodland, Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category more than 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 1500 m1.5 km <br />150,000 cm <br />
Project started 2009/01/01
Works started
Works completed 2011/11/01
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 147 k€147,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources LIFE+ (LIFE07 NAT/SK/000707)

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design North-Transdanubian Water Management Directorate titkarsag@edukovizig.hu Emil Janák
Stakeholder engagement and communication North-Transdanubian Water Management Directorate titkarsag@edukovizig.hu Emil Janák
Works and works supervision North-Transdanubian Water Management Directorate titkarsag@edukovizig.hu Emil Janák
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Ensuring biodiversity
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information