Case study:Merikoski fishway: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower | |Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower | ||
|Country=Finland | |Country=Finland | ||
|Main contact forename= | |Main contact forename=Anne | ||
|Main contact surname= | |Main contact surname=Laine | ||
|Contact organisation=Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for North Ostrobothnia | |||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of Oulujoki River | |Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of Oulujoki River | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Construction of the Merikoski | |Project summary=Construction of the fishway in the Merikoski brook was the first step restoring the Oulujoki river for migrating fish. Merkoski water power plant was the lowest obstacle for fish migration before the fishway was constructed in 2003 enabling migrating fish to rise up to the lower reaches of the river. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment |
Revision as of 10:52, 3 December 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 65° 1' 18.97" N, 25° 29' 15.05" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower |
Country | Finland |
Main contact forename | Anne |
Main contact surname | Laine |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for North Ostrobothnia |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Construction of the fishway in the Merikoski brook was the first step restoring the Oulujoki river for migrating fish. Merkoski water power plant was the lowest obstacle for fish migration before the fishway was constructed in 2003 enabling migrating fish to rise up to the lower reaches of the river.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Select a catchment/subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | - |
---|---|
River basin | Oulujoki River basin |
Subcatchment
River name | Oulujoki River |
---|---|
Area category | more than 10000 km² |
Area (km2) | 2284122,841 km² <br />2,284,100 ha <br /> |
Maximum altitude category | |
Maximum altitude (m) | |
Dominant geology | |
Ecoregion | Fenno-Scandian Shield |
Dominant land cover | |
Waterbody ID |
Site
Name | Merikoski torrent water power plant |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Artificial channel |
Reference morphology | Artificial channel, Fishway |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Artificially regulated |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information