Case study:Restoration of Vesselina River: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 71: Line 71:
        
        
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Project started=2005/09/01
   
|Works started=2007/09/01
   
|Works completed=2008/04/01
     
|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€
|Project started=
|Total1 cost=76
      2005/09/01
|Funding sources=WWF, DOEN Foundation
|Works started=
|Investigation and design cost category=10 - 50 k€
      2007/09/01
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=1 - 10 k€
|Works completed=
|Works1 and supervision cost category=1 - 10 k€
      2008/04/01
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Project completed=
|Monitoring1 cost category=Less than 1 k€
     
|Total cost category=
      10 - 50 k€
|Total1 cost=
     
|Funding sources=
      WWF, DOEN Foundation
|Investigation and design cost category=
      10 - 50 k€
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
      1 - 10 k€
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
      1 - 10 k€
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
      Less than 1 k€
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
      Less than 1 k€
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations

Revision as of 10:03, 3 December 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 43° 1' 48.51" N, 25° 49' 33.96" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Hydromorphology
Country Bulgaria
Main contact forename Ivan
Main contact surname Hristov
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation WWF Danube Carpathian programme Bulgaria
Contact organisation web site http://www.wwf.bg
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Yantra River

Subcatchment

River name Vesselina
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Pontic Province
Dominant land cover Woodland
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name
WFD water body codes BG1YN130R029
WFD (national) typology BGTR7
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Straightened
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation EU - Special Protected Area
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Gravel
River corridor land use Woodland
Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2005/09/01
Works started 2007/09/01
Works completed 2008/04/01
Project completed
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€) 7676 k€ <br />76,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources WWF, DOEN Foundation

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 10 - 50 k€
Stakeholder engagement and communication 1 - 10 k€
Works and works supervision 1 - 10 k€
Post-project management and maintenance Less than 1 k€
Monitoring Less than 1 k€



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Riparian development
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Continuity for organisms No change

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information