Case study:Kleine Beerze: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
}}
{{Location
|Location=51.421033421326726, 5.27979871993832
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=In progress
|Status=In progress
Line 13: Line 7:
|Contact organisation=Waterschap De Dommel
|Contact organisation=Waterschap De Dommel
|Contact organisation url=www.dommel.nl
|Contact organisation url=www.dommel.nl
|Name of parent multi-site project=Building with nature measures in streams
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Building with Nature
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=The Kleine Beerze is a small stream that merges with the Groote Beerze. Currently, the flow velocity in the channel is too low as a consequence of straightening. This sometimes leads to the stream falling dry in periods with little rainfall. Biodiversity in the Kleine Beerze is rather low. Main channel mowing was used as a strategy to enhance diversity in flow velocity, macroinvertebrates and vegetation. In addition to this small-scale building with nature measure, efforts are made to recreate a meandering trajectory for the stream. Furthermore, effects of waterbed pollution are also being researched and various barriers have been made passable for fish.
|Project summary=The Kleine Beerze is a small stream that merges with the Groote Beerze. Currently, the flow velocity in the channel is too low as a consequence of straightening. This sometimes leads to the stream falling dry in periods with little rainfall. Biodiversity in the Kleine Beerze is rather low. Main channel mowing was used as a strategy to enhance diversity in flow velocity, macroinvertebrates and vegetation. In addition to this small-scale building with nature measure, efforts are made to recreate a meandering trajectory for the stream. Furthermore, effects of waterbed pollution are also being researched and various barriers have been made passable for fish.
Line 19: Line 13:
|Project title=Kleine Beerze
|Project title=Kleine Beerze
}}
}}
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
}}
{{Location
|Location=51.421033421326726, 5.27979871993832
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=De Dommel
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=Kleine Beerze
|Name=Kleine Beerze

Latest revision as of 12:40, 26 September 2024


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Ineke
Main contact surname Barten
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Waterschap De Dommel
Contact organisation web site http://www.dommel.nl
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Building with Nature

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Kleine Beerze is a small stream that merges with the Groote Beerze. Currently, the flow velocity in the channel is too low as a consequence of straightening. This sometimes leads to the stream falling dry in periods with little rainfall. Biodiversity in the Kleine Beerze is rather low. Main channel mowing was used as a strategy to enhance diversity in flow velocity, macroinvertebrates and vegetation. In addition to this small-scale building with nature measure, efforts are made to recreate a meandering trajectory for the stream. Furthermore, effects of waterbed pollution are also being researched and various barriers have been made passable for fish.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The main channel mowing strategy leads to a division between a vegetated and an unvegetated zone in the stream profile. The vegetated area is observed to accrete, while the unvegetated area is observed to erode. Macroinvertebrate counts and water levels are still being monitored.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 25' 15.72" N, 5° 16' 47.28" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Meuse
River basin Maas

Subcatchment

River name Dommel
Area category 1000 - 10000 km²
Area (km2) 18001,800 km² <br />180,000 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 7777 m <br />0.077 km <br />7,700 cm <br />
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Western Plains
Dominant land cover Grassland, Intensive agriculture (arable), Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Moorland/heathland, Urban
Waterbody ID NL_99_6_BO_BE_2



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beekherstel Beekloop BmN, Beekherstel Keersop, Beekherstel Reusel Baarschot-Diessen, Boven-Dommel, Buulder Aa, Grote Aa, Herinrichting beekdal Tongelreep, Kleine Aa, traject Smalwater Noord


Site

Name Kleine Beerze
WFD water body codes NL27_B_2_2
WFD (national) typology R4
WFD water body name Kleine Beerze
Pre-project morphology Straightened
Reference morphology Actively meandering
Desired post project morphology Actively meandering
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Sand
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable), Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Moorland/heathland
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information