Case study:Herinrichting beekdal Tongelreep: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.stowa.nl/contact | |Contact organisation url=www.stowa.nl/contact | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary= | |Project summary=The Tongelreep enters the Netherlands at the Achelse Kluis and then flows into the river Dommel near Eindhoven. The Tongelreep is part of the Dommel catchment. Since the 1990s, stream restoration measures were taken to allow the river more space to meander after it had previously, in the past century, been straightened for a faster discharges. As a result of this straightening, parts of woodland, moors and wetlands were at risk of drying out. In addition to these traditional restoration measures, Building with Nature measure were implemented. The Tongelreep is the only Dutch stream where, for building with Nature purposes, gravel beds were introduced near Aalst in addition to dead wood patches. This was done to enrich the stream flora and fauna. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Water depth, flow velocity and substrate cover were measured four times in 2016/2017. In addition, the position of the gravel beds was measured twice per year in the years 2015, 2016 and 2017. These measurements also revealed limited sedimentation, which was 80% gravel in late 2017. The gravel areas moved by on average 1.0m (+/- 0.3m), indicating that they mostly remained in place over a five year period. After the introduction of gravel beds, total species abundance and the number of species typical for an R5-type stream both increased significantly. | |||
|Monitoring surveys and results= | |||
Source: http://edepot.wur.nl/468347 | |||
|Lessons learn= | |Lessons learn=These measurements show the potential of stimulating the origination of gravel beds. Actively introducing gravel would be a technological approach, which may be undesirable. If gravel is already naturally present in the stream, extra gravel may be added, but otherwise, a Building with Nature approach is considered more desirable. | ||
Flow velocity variation can also be stimulated by main channel mowing or by introducing dead wood. When there is insufficient space for these natural measures, (as is the case for the Tongelreep), introducing gravel is an option. Providing sufficient shade over the gravel area is important. | |||
|Project title=Herinrichting beekdal Tongelreep | |Project title=Herinrichting beekdal Tongelreep | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Tongelreepdoorakkerland.jpg | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=De Dommel | ||
{{Project background}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Site | ||
{{Measures}} | |Name=Valkenswaard | ||
|WFD water body code=NL27_T_1_2 | |||
|WFD (national) typology=R5 | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Natuurlijk | |||
|Reference morphology=R5 | |||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Site designation=Netherlands - Natuurbeschermingswet | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Dominant hydrology=Langzaamstromende middenloop + benedenloop op zand | |||
|Dominant substrate=Zand | |||
|River corridor land use=Natuur | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=0.75 | |||
|Mean discharge category=0.1 - 1.0 m³/s | |||
|Mn discharge=0.07- 0.28 | |||
|Average channel gradient category=Less than 0.001 | |||
|Avrg channel gradient=0.0066 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=1700 | |||
|Project started=2007/01/01 | |||
|Works started=2007/01/01 | |||
|Works completed=2014/01/01 | |||
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=1 - 10 k€ | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Waterschap De Dommel | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Waterschap De Dommel | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Other motivation=KRW richtlijnen, verbeteren van de ecologie | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Dood hout, Grind bedden | |||
|Other technical measure=Bouwen met Natuur | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Width & depth variation | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Flow velocities | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Macrophytes | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Nutrient concentrations | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=PH | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=No change | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Salinity | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=No change | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Oxygen balance | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=No change | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Temperature | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=No change | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Specific synthetic pollutants | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Improvement | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Other responses header}} | {{Other responses header}} |
Latest revision as of 13:03, 1 April 2021
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://rhk.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=b9cf56c10d7f4d1db891cecec33d1d96 |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Ineke |
Main contact surname | Barten |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | STOWA |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.stowa.nl/contact |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Tongelreep enters the Netherlands at the Achelse Kluis and then flows into the river Dommel near Eindhoven. The Tongelreep is part of the Dommel catchment. Since the 1990s, stream restoration measures were taken to allow the river more space to meander after it had previously, in the past century, been straightened for a faster discharges. As a result of this straightening, parts of woodland, moors and wetlands were at risk of drying out. In addition to these traditional restoration measures, Building with Nature measure were implemented. The Tongelreep is the only Dutch stream where, for building with Nature purposes, gravel beds were introduced near Aalst in addition to dead wood patches. This was done to enrich the stream flora and fauna.
Monitoring surveys and results
Water depth, flow velocity and substrate cover were measured four times in 2016/2017. In addition, the position of the gravel beds was measured twice per year in the years 2015, 2016 and 2017. These measurements also revealed limited sedimentation, which was 80% gravel in late 2017. The gravel areas moved by on average 1.0m (+/- 0.3m), indicating that they mostly remained in place over a five year period. After the introduction of gravel beds, total species abundance and the number of species typical for an R5-type stream both increased significantly.
Source: http://edepot.wur.nl/468347
Lessons learnt
These measurements show the potential of stimulating the origination of gravel beds. Actively introducing gravel would be a technological approach, which may be undesirable. If gravel is already naturally present in the stream, extra gravel may be added, but otherwise, a Building with Nature approach is considered more desirable.
Flow velocity variation can also be stimulated by main channel mowing or by introducing dead wood. When there is insufficient space for these natural measures, (as is the case for the Tongelreep), introducing gravel is an option. Providing sufficient shade over the gravel area is important.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beekherstel Beekloop BmN, Beekherstel Keersop, Beekherstel Reusel Baarschot-Diessen, Boven-Dommel, Buulder Aa, Grote Aa, Kleine Aa, traject Smalwater Noord, Kleine Beerze
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|