Case study:Lunterse Beek: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(16 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Main contact forename=Maarten | |Main contact forename=Maarten | ||
|Main contact surname=Veldhuis | |Main contact surname=Veldhuis | ||
|Contact organisation= | |Contact organisation=Waterschap Vallei en Veluwe | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.vallei-veluwe.nl/ | |Contact organisation url=www.vallei-veluwe.nl/ | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project= | |Partner organisations=STOWA | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Building with Nature measures in streams | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary= | |Project picture=Lunterse beek.jpg | ||
|Picture description=De oude Lunterse beek | |||
|Project summary=Restoration measures were carried out in a trajectory of the Lunterse Beek to the west of Renswoude, south of the N224 up to the Liniedijk. | |||
Since the Lunterse beek is a mass of water with little flow and dynamics, the water authority created a side channel, which should be embedded in the landscape and improve the stream’s ecology. This side channel also functions as a spillway when discharges are high. Because a weir is present at the location where the stream cuts through the Liniedijk, the side channel was led through a culvert in the dyke, after which it becomes a meandering stream that connects to the Lunterse Beek downstream of the weir. | |||
The side channel passes through the small woodland area of Klein Wolfswinkel, where it passes close by a badger’s sett (Du: Dassenburcht); one of the pictures shows the badger’s nursery. The area also features living quarters of a fox, a hawk and a buzzard and is home to a colony of herons. | |||
The ecology will be monitored further, both at the banks, where stubbs were introduced as a bank edge, and in the stream itself. The vegetation that was introduced at several locations near the stream will be monitored as well. The design of the area is such that little maintenance should be necessary. | |||
The restorion measures in the Lunterse Beek aim to improve the flow conditions and increase the variation in flora and fauna. Fish like the gudge (Nl: riviergrondel) and ide (Nl: winde) will soon be able to swim upstream when the weir at the Groeperkade will be made passable for fish. | |||
Source: https://www.sprengenbeken.nl/tag/lunterse-beek/ | |||
|Project title=Lunterse Beek | |Project title=Lunterse Beek | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 31: | Line 36: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Eem | ||
{{Project background}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Site | ||
{{Measures}} | |Name=Lunterse Beek | ||
|WFD (national) typology=R5, | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Strongly changing | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Dominant hydrology=Mineral ground | |||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, | |||
|River corridor land use=Agriculteral land, forest | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=5 - 10 m | |||
|Avrg bankfull channel width=6 | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=0.6 | |||
|Mean discharge category=0.1 - 1.0 m³/s | |||
|Mn discharge=0.16 | |||
|Average channel gradient category=Less than 0.001 | |||
|Avrg channel gradient=0.0007 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Reach length directly affected=4000 | |||
|Project started=2011 | |||
|Works started=2014/01/01 | |||
|Works completed=2015/01/01 | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Other motivation=Maaibeheer | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Dead wood deposit, Sand deposit, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Flow velocities | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Width & depth variation | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Channel pattern/planform | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Macrophytes | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Oxygen balance | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=PH | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Temperature | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Transparency | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Salinity | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Other responses header}} | {{Other responses header}} |
Latest revision as of 07:49, 30 March 2021
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.sprengenbeken.nl/tag/lunterse-beek/ |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Water quality |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Maarten |
Main contact surname | Veldhuis |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Vallei en Veluwe |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.vallei-veluwe.nl/ |
Partner organisations | STOWA |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Restoration measures were carried out in a trajectory of the Lunterse Beek to the west of Renswoude, south of the N224 up to the Liniedijk.
Since the Lunterse beek is a mass of water with little flow and dynamics, the water authority created a side channel, which should be embedded in the landscape and improve the stream’s ecology. This side channel also functions as a spillway when discharges are high. Because a weir is present at the location where the stream cuts through the Liniedijk, the side channel was led through a culvert in the dyke, after which it becomes a meandering stream that connects to the Lunterse Beek downstream of the weir.
The side channel passes through the small woodland area of Klein Wolfswinkel, where it passes close by a badger’s sett (Du: Dassenburcht); one of the pictures shows the badger’s nursery. The area also features living quarters of a fox, a hawk and a buzzard and is home to a colony of herons.
The ecology will be monitored further, both at the banks, where stubbs were introduced as a bank edge, and in the stream itself. The vegetation that was introduced at several locations near the stream will be monitored as well. The design of the area is such that little maintenance should be necessary.
The restorion measures in the Lunterse Beek aim to improve the flow conditions and increase the variation in flora and fauna. Fish like the gudge (Nl: riviergrondel) and ide (Nl: winde) will soon be able to swim upstream when the weir at the Groeperkade will be made passable for fish.
Source: https://www.sprengenbeken.nl/tag/lunterse-beek/
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Heiligenbergerbeek
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|