Case study:Snoeijinksbeek: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=52.28202329207007, 7.010166355309648 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Snoeijinksbeek |Status=Complete |T...") |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality | |Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
|Contact organisation=Waterschap Vechtstromen | |Contact organisation=Waterschap Vechtstromen | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.vechtstromen.nl | |Contact organisation url=www.vechtstromen.nl | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Building with nature measures in streams | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
| | |Project summary=Water authority Vechtstromen took several measures to improve the ecological quality of this stream and improve its function as a link between the Boerskotten natural area and the river Dinkel. After a succesful experiment with sand suppletion in the upper part of the stream, they implemented the same measure further downstream. This makes this section more shallow. Locally, they created a less straight trajectory. Gravel suppletion was added to the sand suppletion in some locations. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=The original stream valley vegetation types have started to recover after the measure was implemented. The water retention capacity of the stream has improved as well. | |||
|Project title=Snoeijinksbeek | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Vecht (Overijssel) | ||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Snoeijinksbeek | |||
|WFD water body code=NL05_Middendinkel | |||
|WFD (national) typology=R6, | |||
|WFD water body name=Midden Dinkel | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Straightened, Over-deepened | |||
|Reference morphology=Actively meandering, | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Low gradient passively meandering, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, | |||
|River corridor land use=Grassland, Intensive agriculture (arable), Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Moorland/heathland, | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=Less than 2 m | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=Less than 0.5 m | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} |
Latest revision as of 14:28, 10 March 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Maarten |
Main contact surname | Zonderwijk |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Vechtstromen |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.vechtstromen.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Water authority Vechtstromen took several measures to improve the ecological quality of this stream and improve its function as a link between the Boerskotten natural area and the river Dinkel. After a succesful experiment with sand suppletion in the upper part of the stream, they implemented the same measure further downstream. This makes this section more shallow. Locally, they created a less straight trajectory. Gravel suppletion was added to the sand suppletion in some locations.
Monitoring surveys and results
The original stream valley vegetation types have started to recover after the measure was implemented. The water retention capacity of the stream has improved as well.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beentjesgraven, Beneden Regge, De Doorbraak, Deurningerbeek, Dinkel Noord, Jufferbeek, Living Vechte-Dinkel, Marswetering, Midden Regge, Oude Bornschebeek... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|