Case study:Midden Regge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Project web site url= | |Project web site url=www.vechtstromen.nl/buurt/gemeenten/wierden/midden-regge/ | ||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality | |Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality | ||
|Country=Netherlands | |Country=Netherlands |
Revision as of 13:07, 9 March 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 52° 25' 10.17" N, 6° 27' 47.10" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.vechtstromen.nl/buurt/gemeenten/wierden/midden-regge/ |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Maarten |
Main contact surname | Zonderwijk |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Vechtstromen |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.vechtstromen.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Restoration measures in the middle part of the river Regge are part of plans to restore the whole river. In 2006, the streambed was made made more narrow and given a meandering trajectory. Some abondoned meanders were reconnected to the stream. The bed was elevated further. Mowing in the main channel was suspended, while the floodplains were maintained by grazers.
Monitoring surveys and results
Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.
These measures created a varied landscape with low natural levees. Some isolated meanders got a more grassy vegetation than intended because of a high nutrient load.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|