Case study:Deculverting Djupsund stream: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
|Monitoring2 cost=5 | |Monitoring2 cost=5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms, | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish, | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Revision as of 21:04, 4 February 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits, Spatial planning |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Miguel Angel |
Main contact surname | Segarra Valls |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Vannområde Horten-Larvik |
Contact organisation web site | http://https://www.vannportalen.no/vannregioner/vestfold-og-telemark/vannomrader/horten---larvik/ |
Partner organisations | Sandefjord Forvaltningsråd for Anadrom Laksefisk |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Djupsund stream is a very small but very important stram for sea trout in the fjord Mefjorden (Sandefjord municipality), and it has been described as "a small sea trout machine". The upper part of the stream was culverted with pipes that were too small, and this caused problems for crossing way when strong rainfall episodes occurred. Around 80 m of the stream were daylighted, and a new 1 m diameter pipe was installed under the way in December 2020. Gravel was used to cover parts of daylighted stream and the bottom of the pipe under the crossing way.
We intend to restore the riparian vegetation along the daylighted stream during spring 2021, in cooperation with pupils from a nearby school.
Monitoring surveys and results
The recolonization of the new stream stretch by sea trout will be monitored from 2021.
Lessons learnt
New research shows that the ideal amount of spawning gravel in a stream is 20 % of the habitat (https://lakseelver.no/nb/news-2019/utlegg-av-gytegrus). We covered much more of the reopened stream, and will consider to take measures in order to increase the habitat variation.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|