Case study:Lactariabeek: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case study status |Approval status=Draft }} {{Location |Location=51.58142335582062, 5.909234513196244 }} {{Project overview |Project title=Lactariabeek |Status=Complete |The...") |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring | |Themes=Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
|Contact organisation=Waterschap Aa en Maas | |Contact organisation=Waterschap Aa en Maas | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.aaenmaas.nl | |Contact organisation url=www.aaenmaas.nl | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Building with nature measures in streams | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
| | |Project summary=The Lactariabeek is a small stream in a natural stream valley. The surrounding area is composed of woods and agricultural land. It has been straightened in several locations. Six packages of dead wood were introduced in the wooded part of the Lactariabeek stream. The water board performed this experiment to get more experience with dead wood after the successful Snelle Loop experiment. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Macroinvertebrate count and flow velocity were monitored. The results were not as positive as hoped because the stream fell dry. | |||
|Project title=Lactariabeek | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Raam | ||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Lactariabeek | |||
|WFD water body code=NL38_8V | |||
|WFD (national) typology=R4, | |||
|WFD water body name=Lactariabeek | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Straightened, | |||
|Reference morphology=Sinuous, | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Straightened, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, | |||
|River corridor land use=Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Intensive agriculture (arable), | |||
|Mean discharge category=Less than 0.1 m³/s | |||
|Average channel gradient category=Less than 0.001 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} |
Latest revision as of 15:23, 27 January 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Bram |
Main contact surname | Spierings |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Aa en Maas |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.aaenmaas.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Lactariabeek is a small stream in a natural stream valley. The surrounding area is composed of woods and agricultural land. It has been straightened in several locations. Six packages of dead wood were introduced in the wooded part of the Lactariabeek stream. The water board performed this experiment to get more experience with dead wood after the successful Snelle Loop experiment.
Monitoring surveys and results
Macroinvertebrate count and flow velocity were monitored. The results were not as positive as hoped because the stream fell dry.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beek Lage Raam, Beekherstel Lactariabeek, Hooge Raam, Oeffeltse Raam, Tovensche Beek
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|