Case study:Snelle Loop: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Building with nature measures in streams | |Name of parent multi-site project=Building with nature measures in streams | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=After the removal of a weir, the stream's | |Project summary=After the removal of a weir, the stream's flow velocity had become uniform, with little variation in substrate and macroinvertebrates as a consequence. Ten packages of wood were introduced into the stream, in different configurations. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=Students of the HAS Hogeschool have found that the measures have had a positive effect on the ecology. There is now more diversity in macroinvertebrates, including the common clubtail and certain heteroptera species. Hydromorphological effects were positive as well. The wood packages have created more variation in flow velocity and substrate. The backwater effects of the wood created a more favourable hydraulic gradient in the stream. It also requires much less maintenance now. | |Monitoring surveys and results=Students of the HAS Hogeschool have found that the measures have had a positive effect on the ecology. There is now more diversity in macroinvertebrates, including the common clubtail and certain heteroptera species. Hydromorphological effects were positive as well. The wood packages have created more variation in flow velocity and substrate. The backwater effects of the wood created a more favourable hydraulic gradient in the stream. It also requires much less maintenance now. The large improvement in ecological status may also be related to the increased shading, but it is still too soon to conclude that. | ||
|Project title=Snelle Loop | |Project title=Snelle Loop | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Aa (Noord-Brabant) | ||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Snelle Loop | |||
|WFD water body code=NL38_2K | |||
|WFD (national) typology=R4 | |||
|WFD water body name=Esperloop & Snelle Loop | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Artificial channel, | |||
|Reference morphology=Artificial channel, | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Artificial channel, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, | |||
|River corridor land use=Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Intensive agriculture (arable), | |||
|Mean discharge category=0.1 - 1.0 m³/s | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} |
Latest revision as of 13:12, 27 January 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Bram |
Main contact surname | Spierings |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Aa en Maas |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.aaenmaas.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
After the removal of a weir, the stream's flow velocity had become uniform, with little variation in substrate and macroinvertebrates as a consequence. Ten packages of wood were introduced into the stream, in different configurations.
Monitoring surveys and results
Students of the HAS Hogeschool have found that the measures have had a positive effect on the ecology. There is now more diversity in macroinvertebrates, including the common clubtail and certain heteroptera species. Hydromorphological effects were positive as well. The wood packages have created more variation in flow velocity and substrate. The backwater effects of the wood created a more favourable hydraulic gradient in the stream. It also requires much less maintenance now. The large improvement in ecological status may also be related to the increased shading, but it is still too soon to conclude that.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Vlier
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|