Case study:Reestvervangende leiding: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Vecht (Overijssel) | ||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Reestvervangende leiding | |||
|WFD water body code=NL35_Drentse_kanalen | |||
|WFD (national) typology=M3 | |||
|WFD water body name=Drentse kanalen | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Artificial channel, | |||
|Reference morphology=Artificial channel, | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Artificial channel, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable), Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, | |||
|Average channel gradient category=Less than 0.001 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} |
Latest revision as of 15:31, 26 January 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Monitoring |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Sander |
Main contact surname | Verheijen |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Drents Overijsselse Delta |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.wdodelta.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
In the Reestvervangende Leiding, a test with main channel mowing is carried out. The hydrological consequences are monitored by drones, as part of the Dotter project. The aim is to create a bank vegetation that promotes greater biodiversity.
Monitoring surveys and results
So far, there have been no flooding problems because of the change in vegetation. However, the observed years were quite dry and had no large peak in discharge. Further monitoring will have to show the effects of this measure in years with a high discharge peak.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beentjesgraven, Beneden Regge, De Doorbraak, Deurningerbeek, Dinkel Noord, Jufferbeek, Living Vechte-Dinkel, Marswetering, Midden Regge, Oude Bornschebeek... further results
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|