Case study:Hunze bij Torenveen: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Waterlichamen Hunze en Aas.png
|Project picture=Waterlichamen Hunze en Aas.png
|Project summary=Vegetation removal in the stream has been minimized. Small patches of vegetation are removed when there is a risk of the stream getting blocked.
|Picture description=WFD water bodies in the Hunze en Aa's water authority region.
|Monitoring surveys and results=As a result of the measures, there is now a more varied fish population, with more species that prefer a slightly higher flow velocity. Erosion and sedimentation processes have caused a change in the stream profile. Locally, this change, in combination with increased vegetation coverage, has caused the bed to be too narrow to transport sufficient water. This has led to incision of the bed.
|Project summary=The Hunze is a lowland stream with a low flow velocity. Originally a meandering stream, the Hunze has been straightened in many places to facilitate peat transport, agriculture and other economic efforts. There are now various plans to reform the Hunze valley to a state that is closer to its original, natural conditionn. The objective is to restore meanders and create floodplains where possible and promote biodiversity. Vegetation removal in the stream has been minimized. Small patches of vegetation are removed when there is a risk of the stream getting blocked.
|Monitoring surveys and results=As a result of the measures, there is now a more varied fish population, with more species that prefer a slightly higher flow velocity. Erosion and sedimentation processes have caused a change in the stream profile. Locally, this change, in combination with increased vegetation coverage, has caused the bed to be too narrow to transport sufficient water. This has led to stream incision.
|Project title=Hunze bij Torenveen
|Project title=Hunze bij Torenveen
}}
}}
Line 24: Line 25:
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment
{{Site}}
|Subcatchment=Hunze
}}
{{Site
|Name=Hunze
|WFD water body code=NL33HU
|WFD (national) typology=R5,
|WFD water body name=Hunze
|Pre-project morphology=Straightened,
|Reference morphology=Actively meandering,
|Desired post project morphology=Actively meandering,
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
|Dominant substrate=Peat,
|River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable), Rough unimproved grassland/pasture, Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Wetland,
}}
{{Project background}}
{{Project background}}
{{Motivations}}
{{Motivations}}

Latest revision as of 13:21, 26 January 2021

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 0' 19.98" N, 6° 49' 38.38" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Water quality
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Emiel
Main contact surname Galetzka
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Waterschap Hunze en Aa's
Contact organisation web site http://hunzeenaas.nl
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Building with nature measures in streams

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
WFD water bodies in the Hunze en Aa's water authority region.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Hunze is a lowland stream with a low flow velocity. Originally a meandering stream, the Hunze has been straightened in many places to facilitate peat transport, agriculture and other economic efforts. There are now various plans to reform the Hunze valley to a state that is closer to its original, natural conditionn. The objective is to restore meanders and create floodplains where possible and promote biodiversity. Vegetation removal in the stream has been minimized. Small patches of vegetation are removed when there is a risk of the stream getting blocked.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


As a result of the measures, there is now a more varied fish population, with more species that prefer a slightly higher flow velocity. Erosion and sedimentation processes have caused a change in the stream profile. Locally, this change, in combination with increased vegetation coverage, has caused the bed to be too narrow to transport sufficient water. This has led to stream incision.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Ems
River basin Nedereems

Subcatchment

River name Hunze
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Central Plains
Dominant land cover Grassland, Intensive agriculture (arable)
Waterbody ID NL33HU



Site

Name Hunze
WFD water body codes NL33HU
WFD (national) typology R5
WFD water body name Hunze
Pre-project morphology Straightened
Reference morphology Actively meandering
Desired post project morphology Actively meandering
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Peat
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable), Rough unimproved grassland/pasture, Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information