Case study:Hunze bij Torenveen: Difference between revisions
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Waterlichamen Hunze en Aas.png | |Project picture=Waterlichamen Hunze en Aas.png | ||
|Project summary=Vegetation removal in the stream has been minimized. Small patches of vegetation are removed when there is a risk of the stream getting blocked. | |Picture description=WFD water bodies in the Hunze en Aa's water authority region. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=As a result of the measures, there is now a more varied fish population, with more species that prefer a slightly higher flow velocity. Erosion and sedimentation processes have caused a change in the stream profile. Locally, this change, in combination with increased vegetation coverage, has caused the bed to be too narrow to transport sufficient water. This has led to incision | |Project summary=The Hunze is a lowland stream with a low flow velocity. Originally a meandering stream, the Hunze has been straightened in many places to facilitate peat transport, agriculture and other economic efforts. There are now various plans to reform the Hunze valley to a state that is closer to its original, natural conditionn. The objective is to restore meanders and create floodplains where possible and promote biodiversity. Vegetation removal in the stream has been minimized. Small patches of vegetation are removed when there is a risk of the stream getting blocked. | ||
|Monitoring surveys and results=As a result of the measures, there is now a more varied fish population, with more species that prefer a slightly higher flow velocity. Erosion and sedimentation processes have caused a change in the stream profile. Locally, this change, in combination with increased vegetation coverage, has caused the bed to be too narrow to transport sufficient water. This has led to stream incision. | |||
|Project title=Hunze bij Torenveen | |Project title=Hunze bij Torenveen | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Hunze | ||
}} | |||
{{Site | |||
|Name=Hunze | |||
|WFD water body code=NL33HU | |||
|WFD (national) typology=R5, | |||
|WFD water body name=Hunze | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Straightened, | |||
|Reference morphology=Actively meandering, | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Actively meandering, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Dominant substrate=Peat, | |||
|River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable), Rough unimproved grassland/pasture, Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Wetland, | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} |
Latest revision as of 13:21, 26 January 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Water quality |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Emiel |
Main contact surname | Galetzka |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Hunze en Aa's |
Contact organisation web site | http://hunzeenaas.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Hunze is a lowland stream with a low flow velocity. Originally a meandering stream, the Hunze has been straightened in many places to facilitate peat transport, agriculture and other economic efforts. There are now various plans to reform the Hunze valley to a state that is closer to its original, natural conditionn. The objective is to restore meanders and create floodplains where possible and promote biodiversity. Vegetation removal in the stream has been minimized. Small patches of vegetation are removed when there is a risk of the stream getting blocked.
Monitoring surveys and results
As a result of the measures, there is now a more varied fish population, with more species that prefer a slightly higher flow velocity. Erosion and sedimentation processes have caused a change in the stream profile. Locally, this change, in combination with increased vegetation coverage, has caused the bed to be too narrow to transport sufficient water. This has led to stream incision.
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|