Case study:Hunze bij Torenveen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bas Wullems (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=No | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|Dominant substrate=Peat, | |||
|River corridor land use=Intensive agriculture (arable), Rough unimproved grassland/pasture, Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Wetland, | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background}} |
Revision as of 14:37, 15 January 2021
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 53° 0' 19.98" N, 6° 49' 38.38" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Water quality |
Country | Netherlands |
Main contact forename | Emiel |
Main contact surname | Galetzka |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Waterschap Hunze en Aa's |
Contact organisation web site | http://hunzeenaas.nl |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Vegetation removal in the stream has been minimized. Small patches of vegetation are removed when there is a risk of the stream getting blocked.
Monitoring surveys and results
Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.
As a result of the measures, there is now a more varied fish population, with more species that prefer a slightly higher flow velocity. Erosion and sedimentation processes have caused a change in the stream profile. Locally, this change, in combination with increased vegetation coverage, has caused the bed to be too narrow to transport sufficient water. This has led to incision of the bed.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|