Case study:Rehabilitation of the river Segeråga: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
{{Case study image
{{Case study image
|File name=After measures in the lower part of river
|File name=After measures in the lower part of river
|Caption=After removal of the inorganic material (sludge/fine sand), reinfoorcement of river bank and gravel for spawning grounds
|Caption=After removal of the inorganic material (sludge/fine sand), reinfoorcement of river bank and gravel for spawning grounds. Photo: Kristin B. Klausen, local watercoordinator.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}

Revision as of 11:19, 2 November 2020

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 66° 43' 0.13" N, 13° 16' 28.41" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Water quality
Country Norway
Main contact forename Kjetil
Main contact surname Hansen
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Municipality of Rødøy
Contact organisation web site http://www.rodoy.kommune.no/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Project background

Segeråga is located in Rødøy and Meløy municipality in the northern part of Norway. The river has been exposed to significant man-made changes during the last 30 years. New cultivation problems in the upper part of the river, with drainage and ditching of large peatlands, have had a documentable and significant negative ecological consequence for the river. The river has had increased sludge of fine particulate inorganic material (sludge/fine sand). The fish stock have probably been significantly reduces because of this.

The primary goal for the project is to increase the stocks of anadromous salmonids in Segeråga compared to the period 2013-2019. A secondary goal is that the content of erosion and organic material in the water is reduced compared to the pre-situation, and that the river's quality as a habitat for fish and freshwater organisms is improved, especially through a reduction in the sludge of functional areas for trout and salmon.

Implementation

The project started with surveys in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Two reports describes the aquatic ecological status of segeråga, through benthic and juvenile fish surveys in the watercourse, supplemented with some water chemistry. Based on this knowledge from the surveys, as well as field inspections and problemmapping, a rehabilitationplan was made in 2017. The rehabilitationplan suggests rehabilitation measures to re-establish the river as a river with sea-migrating salmonids, with particular emphasis on recovering the sea trout stock. This project was also a pilot project for this type of smaller rivers with man-made changes and new cultivation problems. The rehabilitation started in 2017 includes measures as removing the inorganic material (sludge/fine sand), digging out ponds, gravel for spawning grounds, fish ladder, reduce runoff from agricultural land, habitat improvement, sediment ponds and reinforcement of riverbanks.

Summary/conclusion

The project successfully implemented all planned measures, with some locale adjustments in the field, such as the placement of spawning gravel. The last measures were implemented in 2020. Therefore, the results of the measures are not yet available. It will be important to monitor the river in a few years, to see the result from the measures and evaluate the project.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


There has been no conflict with the landowners, and some have been involved in the measures.

The project has been possible due to a committed municipality and funding from the state.


Image gallery


File:Removing inorganic material
Removing inorganic material (sludge/fine sand. Photo: Kjetil Hansen, Rødøy municipality
File:After measures in the lower part of river
After removal of the inorganic material (sludge/fine sand), reinfoorcement of river bank and gravel for spawning grounds. Photo: Kristin B. Klausen, local watercoordinator.
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Segeråga
WFD water body codes 159-194-R
WFD (national) typology RMM1221
WFD water body name Segeråga
Pre-project morphology shallower, overgrown
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology Run-glide, Ponded, Pool-riffle
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Sea trout (Salmo trutta), arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus)
Dominant hydrology Perennial Snow-rain (SR)
Dominant substrate Silt
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable), Coniferous woodland (semi natural)
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 1000010,000 m <br />10 km <br />1,000,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 206206 k€ <br />206,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Norwegian Environment Agency, County Governor og Nordland

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 10 - 50 k€ 3636 k€ <br />36,000 € <br /> Rødøy municipality
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision 100 - 500 k€ 170170 k€ <br />170,000 € <br /> Rødøy municipality
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Land drainage
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform, Continuity of sediment transport, Flow velocities, Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones, Substrate conditions, Width & depth variation
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Age structure, Invertebrates: Diversity
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project Bank erosion


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Construction gravel bays, gravel for spawning grounds, Removal of sediment, Removal of fish barriers, Natural erosion embankments, er
Floodplain / River corridor Removal of sediments
Planform / Channel pattern Decrease sedimentation, Creation of pond
Other Fish habitat restoration, Improving fish migration, sediment ponds
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Reducing bank side collapse (source of sediment)
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Substrate conditions Yes No Yes No No Awaiting results
Width & depth variation Yes No Yes No No Awaiting results

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Abundance Yes No No Yes No Awaiting results
Fish: Age structure Yes No No Yes No Awaiting results
Invertebrates: Diversity Yes No No Yes No Awaiting results
Invertebrates: Abundance Yes No No Yes No Awaiting results

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Nutrient concentrations Yes No No Yes No Awaiting results
PH Yes No No Yes No Awaiting results

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://https://brage.nina.no/nina-xmlui/handle/11250/2446580 Plan for rehabilitation of the river
http://https://brage.nina.no/nina-xmlui/handle/11250/2436896 Fish biological survey
http://https://niva.brage.unit.no/niva-xmlui/handle/11250/2478427 Survey of physico-chemical quality elements and biology

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information