Case study:MediCyn: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 61: Line 61:
{{Project background
{{Project background
|Project started=2018/01/01
|Project started=2018/01/01
|Total1 cost=867027
|Total cost category=500 - 1000 k€
|Total1 cost=867.027
|Funding sources=This project was financed by the European Union (433 513 € – 50 %), the Water Agency (Rhône Méditerranée Corse) (209 481 € – 24 %) and the Region Sud (156 000 € – 18 %).
|Funding sources=This project was financed by the European Union (433 513 € – 50 %), the Water Agency (Rhône Méditerranée Corse) (209 481 € – 24 %) and the Region Sud (156 000 € – 18 %).
|Invst and design cost=34466
|Investigation and design cost category=10 - 50 k€
|Wrk and supervision cost=420783
|Invst and design cost=34.466
|Monitoring2 cost=426305
|Works1 and supervision cost category=100 - 500 k€
|Wrk and supervision cost=420.783
|Monitoring1 cost category=100 - 500 k€
|Monitoring2 cost=426.305
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations

Latest revision as of 12:30, 25 February 2020

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 43° 29' 14.05" N, 4° 48' 56.95" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://www.marseille-port.fr/fr/Page/18451
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country France
Main contact forename Isabelle
Main contact surname Quoniam
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Grand Port Maritime de Marseille
Contact organisation web site http://www.marseille-port.fr/fr/Page/18451
Partner organisations TOUR DU VALAT
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Filling of one of the temporary marshes in August by pumping

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Context The Camargue wetlands are used in many ways which correspond to different types of water management. Such anthropic practices have transformed the natural habitats in many ways. Among these, traditional gaming water management, which targets the waterfowl, consists in the introduction of fresh water during summer, a period that is usually dry in the Mediterranean climate. This change in the natural cycle of water (i.e. a shorter dry period of temporary water bodies) leads to the loss of several Mediterranean species and to the eutrophication of the habitats as the organic matter has a shorter period to mineralize. The management plan of the natural habitats of the Euromediterranean port of Marseille-Fos (GPMM) has the following objectives: (1) insure a favourable conservation status to the natural habitats and wild species, and (2) maintain traditional activities that are environmentally sustainable. Objectives and implementation Three types of water management, corresponding to 3 hydraulic calendars, will be tested: (1) the gaming calendar (July – January), (2) the Mediterranean calendar (November – April) and (3) the intermediate calendar (October – May). To that end, we will create 9 ponds within the “Relai” (one of the GPMM natural estates), and implement the 3 calendars. At the “Grand Clos” (another GPMM’s natural estates), the traditional gaming water management will be maintained but we will test the intermediate calendar at 3 ponds which will be chosen by the local hunting society (SCPAM).

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Measure of the effects and future directions We will monitor the respective effects of the 3 hydraulic calendars on the Mediterranean biodiversity, together with the hunting and pastoral values. The measures target the habitat (water levels, salinity), gaming and grazing activities (hunting bags, foraging value, users satisfaction…) and biodiversity (aquatic plants, dragonflies, ducks…).

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


The results of this monitoring will help the conservation managers to decide which hydraulic calendar(s) should be applied in the future to achieve the objectives of their management plan.


Image gallery


Unknown.png
Unknown-1.png
Unknown-2.png
Unknown-3.png
Unknown-4.png
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Rhône - Méditerranée
River basin Rhône-Mediterranean

Subcatchment

River name Verdier marshes
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion
Dominant land cover Coastal wetlands and lagoons
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: INTERREG MED WETNET - Membership card of the Verdier Marshes-Rhone Delta Wetland Contract, Restoration of the Cassaire wetland (Rhôle delta), The Verdier marshes


Site

Name “Relai” and “Grand Clos”
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation EU - Special Protected Area
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest Dark spreadwing Lestes macrostigma (Insecta: Odonata)
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2018/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 500 - 1000 k€
Total cost (k€) 867.027867.027 k€ <br />867,027 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources This project was financed by the European Union (433 513 € – 50 %), the Water Agency (Rhône Méditerranée Corse) (209 481 € – 24 %) and the Region Sud (156 000 € – 18 %).

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 10 - 50 k€ 34.46634.466 k€ <br />34,466 € <br />
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision 100 - 500 k€ 420.783420.783 k€ <br />420,783 € <br />
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring 100 - 500 k€ 426.305426.305 k€ <br />426,305 € <br />



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Restoration of the water cycle of the Mediterranean temporary marshes
Biology Improvement of the conservation status of the Mediterranean biodiversity
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Grand Clos” site: hydraulic isolation of 3 temporary ponds to delay the date of autumn water fill in
Floodplain / River corridor “Relai” site: digging of 9 temporary ponds
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Hydraulic calendars controlled by pumping and irrigation network
Social measures (incl. engagement) Users (hunters and farmers) consultation
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]] No No No No No

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]] No No No No No

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Salinity Yes Yes No Yes No

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
dragonflies Yes Yes Yes No No
Public perceptions Yes Yes Yes No No


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information