Case study:Retoration of Grobruelva: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|Invasive species present=No | |Invasive species present=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project background}} | {{Project background | ||
|Project started=2017/08/01 | |||
|Project completed=2020/01/01 | |||
|Total1 cost=300 | |||
|Funding sources=Land owners, municipality and Norwegian Environmental Agency | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Vannområdet Indre Oslofjord Vest | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Ingvild | |||
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Tandberg | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Vannområdet | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Ingvild | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Tandberg | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Vannområdet | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Ingvild | |||
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Tandberg | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} | ||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} |
Revision as of 22:28, 13 January 2020
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: none specified
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Ingvild |
Main contact surname | Tandberg |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Vannområde Indre Oslofjord Vest |
Contact organisation web site | http://https://www.vannportalen.no/vannregioner/glomma/vannomrader-glomma/indre-oslofjord-vest/ |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
This project aimes to improve the habitat conditions of fast-growing sea trout (salmo trutta) in the Grobruelva river in the Bømlo municipality (Vestland). They are impaired by re-routing of side arms, regulating of the main channel and pollution (streets and agricuture). Habitat improving measures are planned, but not conducted yet.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|