Case study:Lunterse Beek

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 52° 4' 3.69" N, 5° 31' 27.79" E

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E Lunterse Beek\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=Netherlands\" title=\"Netherlands\"\u003ENetherlands\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Water quality\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"Lunterse Beek","link":"","lat":52.067691943484,"lon":5.5243869925836,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site	http://www.sprengenbeken.nl/tag/lunterse-beek/
Themes	Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring, Water quality
Country	Netherlands
Main contact forename	Maarten
Main contact surname	Veldhuis
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation	STOWA
Contact organisation web site	http://www.vallei-veluwe.nl/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project	Vallei en Veluwe
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

Het traject dat nu is aangepakt betreft een deel van de Lunterse beek, westelijk van Renswoude, net zuidelijk van de N224 tot aan de Liniedijk van de Grebbelinie.

Omdat de Lunterse beek een bak vol water is, met weinig stroming en dynamiek, heeft het waterschap een nevengeul gemaakt, die landschappelijk in het gebied moest worden ingericht en de beek een beter ecologisch milieu moet geven. Deze nevengeul dient tevens als overloop bij grote waterafvoeren. Omdat in de doorsnijding van de liniedijk een stuw zit in de beek, is de nevengeul via een duiker door de liniedijk gevoerd, waarna deze meanderend aansluit op de Lunterse beek na de stuw. 

De nevengeul loopt door een klein bosgebied van Klein Wolfswinkel, waar vlak langs een dassenburcht moest worden gegraven, op een van de foto’s is de kraamkamer te zien. Verder zijn er verblijfplaatsen van de vos, de havik en de buizerd en is er een reigerskolonie.

De ecologie zal verder worden gevolgd, zowel bij de oevers, waar men stobben heeft toegepast als oeverafscheiding, in de beek en ook ten aanzien van de beplanting welke langs de beek is geplaatst op een aantal plaatsen. De inrichting heeft zodanig plaats gevonden dat er weinig tot geen onderhoud aan zal plaats hoeven te vinden.

Het herstel van de Lunterse Beek is er op gericht dat het water in de beek beter gaat stromen en dat er meer variatie in plantengroei en diersoorten komt. Vissen zoals de riviergrondel en de winde kunnen binnenkort stroomopwaarts zwemmen omdat de stuw bij de Groeperkade voor vissen passeerbaar wordt gemaakt.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Catchment and subcatchment Select a catchment/subcatchment Site Edit site Name Lunterse Beek WFD water body codes WFD (national) typology R5 WFD water body name Pre-project morphology Strongly changing Reference morphology Desired post project morphology Heavily modified water body Yes National/international site designation Local/regional site designations Protected species present No Invasive species present No Species of interest Dominant hydrology Mineral ground Dominant substrate Sand River corridor land use Agriculteral land, forest Average bankfull channel width category 5 - 10 m Average bankfull channel width (m) 66 m <br />0.006 km <br />600 cm <br /> Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m Average bankfull channel depth (m) 0.60.6 m <br />6.0e-4 km <br />60 cm <br /> Mean discharge category 0.1 - 1.0 m³/s Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 0.160.16 m³/s <br />160 l/s <br /> Average channel gradient category more than 0.1 Average channel gradient 0.7 Average unit stream power (W/m2) 183.064183.064 W/m² <br /> Project background Edit project background Reach length directly affected (m) Project started Works started Works completed Project completed Total cost category Total cost (k€) Benefit to cost ratio Funding sources Cost for project phases Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname Investigation and design Stakeholder engagement and communication Works and works supervision Post-project management and maintenance Monitoring Reasons for river restoration Edit reasons for restoration Mitigation of a pressure Hydromorphology Biology Physico-chemical Other reasons for the project Measures Edit Measures Structural measures Bank/bed modifications Floodplain / River corridor Planform / Channel pattern Other Non-structural measures Management interventions Social measures (incl. engagement) Other Monitoring Hydromorphological quality elements Edit Hydromorphological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Biological quality elements Edit biological quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Physico-chemical quality elements Edit Physico-chemical quality elements Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic Edit Other responses Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative Monitoring documents Upload monitoring documents Additional documents and videos Upload additional documents Additional links and references Edit links and references Link Description Supplementary Information Edit Supplementary Information