Case study:Flood detention basin (HRB) Mengede: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(41 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Flood detention basin (HRB) Ickern-Mengede}} | |||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status= | |Status=Complete | ||
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology | |Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology | ||
|Country=Germany | |Country=Germany | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
|Contact organisation url=eglv.de | |Contact organisation url=eglv.de | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Part of the integrated river basin management for the Emscher Region (865 | |Project picture=560EmscherKm48,5-57,7 13041455 Kopie.jpg | ||
Momentarily, the river system is being restructured | |Picture description=Aerial view of the HRB Ickern-Mengede during construction | ||
|Project summary=Part of the integrated river basin management for the Emscher Region (865 km<sup>2</sup>, 2.700 inhabitants/ km<sup>2</sup>) is the revitalization of the river Emscher and its tributaries. Due to industrialization the waterbodies were systematically developed as open wastewater sewers in the beginning of the 20th century. Economic and technical alternatives such as closed sewer systems could not be implemented due to constant subsidence caused by coal mining. | |||
Momentarily, the river system is being restructured in order to enable the Emscher to once again be a fully functioning, continuous water-based ecosystem with typical topology and vegetation. | |||
An ecological concept based on the assumption of a non-interrupted river as a connection from the source to the mouth has been developed. | An ecological concept based on the assumption of a non-interrupted river as a connection from the source to the mouth has been developed. | ||
Studies on the feasibility of restructuring the Emscher show, that due to coal mining, industrial impacts and population changes the “original” conditions can never be reached again. It will not be possible to return the Emscher to its original, meandering state. Therefore, the reference conditions are no direct goals for the river restoration, but they give orientation in the planning procedure. | Studies on the feasibility of restructuring the Emscher show, that due to coal mining, industrial impacts and population changes the “original” conditions can never be reached again. It will not be possible to return the Emscher to its original, meandering state. Therefore, the reference conditions are no direct goals for the river restoration, but they give orientation in the planning procedure. | ||
One of the first hot spots | One of the first hot spots that has been put into practice is the HRB Ickern-Mengede. | ||
The HRB | The HRB comprises an area of 30 ha, where a typical lowland river with natural substrats, features and vegetation can be formed. A varied mosaic of biotopes, which are typical for floodplains (alder floodplain forest, sedge, typha and phragmites reed, floodgrass and potamogeton) is expected to develop. Most importantly, the basin can hold a volume of 1,1 km<sup>3</sup> to protect the downstream riparian communities. After the ecological restoration of the Emscher basin, it won't be able to discharge floods as quickly, hence the upstream flood protection must be enhanced. | ||
Two million m | Two million m<sup>3</sup> of native soil had to be excavated. 450 000 m<sup>3</sup> of this have been used to build a landscape monument between the basin and the close highway, thereby reducing noise pollution for the inhabitants of the basin and the close area. It has also been made accessible for the public as a lookout. | ||
The river Emscher will be integrated into the basin, hence even smaller floods will reach the floodplain that has been created. Parts of the basin will be flooded about 80 days a year. Since the bottom of the HRB is uneven, parts of it will constantly be a body of standing water, whereas some elevated parts will be islands even during high floods. | |||
This diversity of topologic forms will lead to a great diversity in habitats - and therefore species. | |||
As of now, the basin is still divided into three smaller parts by the dyked Emscher, because it needs to be separated from the wastewater which the Emscher is still carrying. Only during high floods diluted wastewater will run over the dykes to flood the basins. Once the wastewater is fully removed from the river, there will be a slight remodelling of the basins (removal of the dykes), thus creating the possibility for the river to mold its own body and have access to the floodplain. | |||
Public participation process during the planning phase, 2006 a public workshop was organised by the EG on the design aspects of the construction (e.g. bike trails). | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=HRBDoMengede VegKart 18.7.2013 006.jpg | |||
|Caption=View on one of the basins | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=HRBDoMengede VegKart 18.7.2013 091.jpg | |||
|Caption=View into basin nr. 2, with deadwood and <i>Salix spec. </i> visible | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
{{Site}} | |Subcatchment=Emscher | ||
{{Project background}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations}} | {{Site | ||
{{Measures}} | |Name=HRB Ickern-Mengede | ||
|WFD water body code=DE_NRW_2772_O | |||
|WFD (national) typology=Type 15: small sand-dominated lowland river | |||
|WFD water body name=Emscher | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Artificial bed, Over deepened, Straightened, Single channel, | |||
|Reference morphology=Actively meandering, | |||
|Desired post project morphology=Actively meandering, Set back defence, | |||
|Heavily modified water body=Yes | |||
|Protected species present=Yes | |||
|Invasive species present=Yes | |||
|Dominant hydrology=Groundwater, Quick run-off, | |||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, Silt, | |||
|River corridor land use=Urban, Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Intensive agriculture (arable), | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category=5 - 10 m | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | |||
|Average channel gradient category=Less than 0.001 | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Project started=2005/01/01 | |||
|Works started=2010/01/01 | |||
|Works completed=2013/12/31 | |||
|Total cost category=more than 10000 k€ | |||
|Total1 cost=62000 | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Emschergenossenschaft | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Emschergenossenschaft | |||
|Works1 and supervision cost category=more than 10000 k€ | |||
|Wrk and supervision cost=43700 | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Emschergenossenschaft | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Emschergenossenschaft | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Emschergenossenschaft | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations | |||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=development of typical structures for the river and the riparian zone | |||
|Biological quality elements=Create a new natural habitat with continuity for benthos, fishes and other organisms | |||
|Other motivation=Ensuring flood protection, development of an ecological hot spot, landscape enhancement | |||
}} | |||
{{Measures | |||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=removal of bottom slab formwork, Adding sinuosity, | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Increase water retention area, Connection to wider floodplain, Wetland habitat | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Channel naturalisation, Improvement of channel morphology, Enabling dynamics, Meandering channel, | |||
|Social measures=Community involvement, | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Channel pattern/planform | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{Hydromorphological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Width & depth variation | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Biological quality elements header}} | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Invertebrates | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Macrophytes | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | ||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Nutrient concentrations | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Oxygen balance | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=PH | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Salinity | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Temperature | |||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Result=Awaiting results | |||
}} | |||
{{End table}} | {{End table}} | ||
{{Other responses header}} | {{Other responses header}} |
Latest revision as of 16:39, 2 January 2019
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | Germany |
Main contact forename | Mechthild |
Main contact surname | Semrau |
Main contact user ID | User:EGLV |
Contact organisation | Emschergenossenschaft |
Contact organisation web site | http://eglv.de |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Part of the integrated river basin management for the Emscher Region (865 km2, 2.700 inhabitants/ km2) is the revitalization of the river Emscher and its tributaries. Due to industrialization the waterbodies were systematically developed as open wastewater sewers in the beginning of the 20th century. Economic and technical alternatives such as closed sewer systems could not be implemented due to constant subsidence caused by coal mining.
Momentarily, the river system is being restructured in order to enable the Emscher to once again be a fully functioning, continuous water-based ecosystem with typical topology and vegetation.
An ecological concept based on the assumption of a non-interrupted river as a connection from the source to the mouth has been developed.
Studies on the feasibility of restructuring the Emscher show, that due to coal mining, industrial impacts and population changes the “original” conditions can never be reached again. It will not be possible to return the Emscher to its original, meandering state. Therefore, the reference conditions are no direct goals for the river restoration, but they give orientation in the planning procedure. One of the first hot spots that has been put into practice is the HRB Ickern-Mengede. The HRB comprises an area of 30 ha, where a typical lowland river with natural substrats, features and vegetation can be formed. A varied mosaic of biotopes, which are typical for floodplains (alder floodplain forest, sedge, typha and phragmites reed, floodgrass and potamogeton) is expected to develop. Most importantly, the basin can hold a volume of 1,1 km3 to protect the downstream riparian communities. After the ecological restoration of the Emscher basin, it won't be able to discharge floods as quickly, hence the upstream flood protection must be enhanced. Two million m3 of native soil had to be excavated. 450 000 m3 of this have been used to build a landscape monument between the basin and the close highway, thereby reducing noise pollution for the inhabitants of the basin and the close area. It has also been made accessible for the public as a lookout.
The river Emscher will be integrated into the basin, hence even smaller floods will reach the floodplain that has been created. Parts of the basin will be flooded about 80 days a year. Since the bottom of the HRB is uneven, parts of it will constantly be a body of standing water, whereas some elevated parts will be islands even during high floods. This diversity of topologic forms will lead to a great diversity in habitats - and therefore species.
As of now, the basin is still divided into three smaller parts by the dyked Emscher, because it needs to be separated from the wastewater which the Emscher is still carrying. Only during high floods diluted wastewater will run over the dykes to flood the basins. Once the wastewater is fully removed from the river, there will be a slight remodelling of the basins (removal of the dykes), thus creating the possibility for the river to mold its own body and have access to the floodplain.
Public participation process during the planning phase, 2006 a public workshop was organised by the EG on the design aspects of the construction (e.g. bike trails).
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Upper Emscher
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|