Case study:Timber float restorations at River Iijoki: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=
|Approval status=Approved
   
 
 
   
      Draft
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 15: Line 10:
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower, Hydromorphology, Land use management - forestry
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower, Hydromorphology, Land use management - forestry
|Country=Finland
|Country=Finland
|Main contact forename=Yrjänä
|Main contact forename=Timo
|Main contact surname=Timo
|Main contact surname=Yrjänä
|Contact organisation=Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment
|Contact organisation=Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for North Ostrobothnia
|Contact organisation url=www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=25563&lan=fi
|Partner organisations=Metsähallitus (National Forestry Board)
|Multi-site=Yes
|Multi-site=Yes
|Project picture=Iijoki brook.png
|Project picture=Iijoki.JPG
|Picture description=Iijoki brook (photo: www.ymparisto.fi)
|Project summary=River Iijoki has been restored mainly because of altered river morphology caused by intensive forestry and timber floating. Besides the main channel of River Iijoki, also all tributaries of this large river area have been restored. The main channel of the river is mainly harnessed for hydro power production and also two tributaries are regulated.
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Map of Iijoki catchment.gif
|Caption=Map of Iijoki catchment
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=
Line 30: Line 38:
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=Catchment of River Kostonjoki
|Name=Catchment of River Kostonjoki
|Pre-project morphology=Straight,High width:depth
|Pre-project morphology=Straight,High width:depth, embarked, monotonous
|Reference morphology=Sinuous,Braided
|Reference morphology=Sinuous, single channel, Pool-riffle, Run-glide
|Heavily modified water body=No
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
|Protected species present=No
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
|Dominant hydrology=Artificially regulated
|Dominant hydrology=partly regulated, partly natural hydrological regime
|Dominant substrate=Cobble
|Dominant substrate=Cobble
|River corridor land use=Woodland
|River corridor land use=Woodland
|Average bankfull channel width category=10 - 50 m
|Average bankfull channel width category=10 - 50 m
|Average bankfull channel depth category=2 - 5 m
|Average bankfull channel depth category=2 - 5 m
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=2.5 m
|Mean discharge category=100 - 1000 m³/s
|Mn discharge=174
|Average channel gradient category=more than 0.1
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Project started=1988/01/01
   
|Works completed=2011/12/31
   
|Project completed=2013/12/31
     
|Total cost category=10 - 50 k€
|Project started=
|Total1 cost=15
      1988/01/01
|Funding sources=Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
|Works started=
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Timo
|Works completed=
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Yrjänä
      2011/01/01
|Works1 and supervision cost category=1 - 10 k€
|Project completed=
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Timo
|Total cost category=
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Yrjänä
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=1 - 10 k€
|Total1 cost=
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Metsähallitus, federal forestry center
     
|Funding sources=
      Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
      Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
      Timo
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
      Yrjänä
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
     
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
      Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
      Timo
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
      Yrjänä
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
      Metsähallitus, federal forestry center
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
Line 121: Line 76:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Building submerged weir, Removal of old logs, Re-introducing spawning gravel, Habitat restoration, Removal of revetments
   
|Floodplain / River corridor=Remeandering, Reconnection of drained river sections, Removal of embankments
   
|Planform / Channel pattern=Adding sinuosity,
      Building submerged weirs,Removal of old logs,Re-introducing stones,Removal of revetments
|Other technical measure=Rehabilitation of water levels in nearby lakes
|Floodplain / River corridor=
|Management interventions=fish stockings, Monitoring strategy, juridical processes
     
|Planform / Channel pattern=
      Introducing sinuosity
|Other technical measure=
     
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
     
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
Line 231: Line 175:
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Biological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Biological quality elements header}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Fish: Abundance
   
|Monitored before=Yes
   
|Monitored after=Yes
   
|Qualitative monitoring=No
   
|Quantitative monitoring=No
      Fish: Abundance
|Control site used=No
|Monitored before=
|Result=Improvement
     
|Monitored after=
      Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
      Awaiting results
}}
}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
{{Biological quality element table row
|Element=
|Element=Invertebrates
   
|Monitored before=Yes
   
|Monitored after=Yes
      Fish: Disturbance-sensitive species
|Qualitative monitoring=No
|Monitored before=
|Quantitative monitoring=No
     
|Control site used=No
|Monitored after=
|Result=Inconclusive
      Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
      Awaiting results
}}
{{Biological_quality_element_table_row
|Element=
   
   
      Invertebrates: Disturbance-sensitive species
|Monitored before=
     
|Monitored after=
      Yes
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
      Awaiting results
}}
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_elements_header}}
{{Physico-chemical quality elements header}}
{{Physico-chemical_quality_element_table_row
 
|Element=
   
   
   
   
     
|Monitored before=
     
|Monitored after=
     
|Qualitative monitoring=
     
|Quantitative monitoring=
     
|Control site used=
     
|Result=
     
}}
{{End_table}}
{{End_table}}
{{Other_responses_header}}
{{Other_responses_header}}
Line 335: Line 223:
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Map of Iijoki catchment.gif
|Caption=Map of Iijoki catchment
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Iijoki brook after rstoration.png
|Caption=Use of timber material in experimental devices to control fine sediments (photo: www.ymparisto.fi)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Restoration of forest stream in the Iijoki area.png
|Caption=Restoration of forest stream in the Iijoki area (photo: www.ymparisto.fi)
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
Line 355: Line 229:
{{Supplementary_Information
{{Supplementary_Information
|Information=
|Information=
   
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 14:42, 2 January 2019

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 65° 19' 28.71" N, 25° 25' 40.83" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=5579&lan=fi
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower, Hydromorphology, Land use management - forestry
Country Finland
Main contact forename Timo
Main contact surname Yrjänä
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for North Ostrobothnia
Contact organisation web site http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=25563&lan=fi
Partner organisations Metsähallitus (National Forestry Board)
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Restoration of Kostonjoki River
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


River Iijoki has been restored mainly because of altered river morphology caused by intensive forestry and timber floating. Besides the main channel of River Iijoki, also all tributaries of this large river area have been restored. The main channel of the river is mainly harnessed for hydro power production and also two tributaries are regulated.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Map of Iijoki catchment


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Iijoki River basin
River basin Iijoki River Basin

Subcatchment

River name Iijoki River
Area category more than 10000 km²
Area (km2) 14191 km²1,419,100 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 370 m0.37 km <br />37,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology Organic (i.e. Peat)
Ecoregion Fenno-Scandian Shield
Dominant land cover Woodland
Waterbody ID



Site

Name Catchment of River Kostonjoki
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Straight, High width:depth, embarked, monotonous
Reference morphology Sinuous, single channel, Pool-riffle, Run-glide
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology partly regulated, partly natural hydrological regime
Dominant substrate Cobble
River corridor land use Woodland
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category 100 - 1000 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 174174 m³/s <br />174,000 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category more than 0.1
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 1988/01/01
Works started
Works completed 2011/12/31
Project completed 2013/12/31
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€) 1515 k€ <br />15,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment Timo Yrjänä
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision 1 - 10 k€ Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment Timo Yrjänä
Post-project management and maintenance 1 - 10 k€
Monitoring Metsähallitus, federal forestry center



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Timber floating
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Width & depth variation, Flow velocities, Structure & condition of riparian zones
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Disturbance-sensitive species, Invertebrates: Disturbance-sensitive species
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Flood risk management


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Building submerged weir, Removal of old logs, Re-introducing spawning gravel, Habitat restoration, Removal of revetments
Floodplain / River corridor Remeandering, Reconnection of drained river sections, Removal of embankments
Planform / Channel pattern Adding sinuosity
Other Rehabilitation of water levels in nearby lakes
Non-structural measures
Management interventions fish stockings, Monitoring strategy, juridical processes
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Improvement
Width & depth variation Yes Improvement
Channel pattern/planform Yes Improvement
Flow velocities Yes Improvement
Structure & condition of riparian zones Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes No No No Improvement
Invertebrates Yes Yes No No No Inconclusive


Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information