Case study:Ddu Restoration Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
|Project picture=Restoration2016.JPG
|Project picture=Restoration2016.JPG
|Picture description=Restoration of the river
|Picture description=Restoration of the river
|Project summary=Restoration of some sections of the Afon Ddu has been carried out by legacy Environment Agency Wales and Countryside Council for Wales and partner organisation Snowdonia National Park Authority since 2005. The river was designated as a pearl mussel Site of Special Scientific Interest in 2010/11.
|Project summary=This river was badly damaged by dredging / drainage operations in 1996/7. This work led to the discovery of a previously unknown population of Margaritifera margaritifera - the population was badly damaged by this work.
Since the formation of Natural Resources Wales, further extensive work has been carried out to restore in channel geomorphology, through the replacement of boulders and gravel seeding with an objective of improving the habitat for salmonids and Margaritifera margaritifera.
Work to restore some sections of the Afon Ddu has been carried out by legacy Environment Agency Wales and Countryside Council for Wales and partner organisation Snowdonia National Park Authority since 2005. The bulk of this work concentrated on fencing out the river to reduce livestock access, but a short section of the most damaged section was restored in 2006.
 
The river was designated as a pearl mussel Site of Special Scientific Interest in 2010/11.
Since the formation of Natural Resources Wales, further work has been carried out with the aim of restoring in channel geomorphology, through the replacement of boulders and gravel seeding with an objective of improving the habitat for salmonids and Margaritifera margaritifera.
The small catchment size means that close co-operation with landowners is likely to be more effective than in larger, dispersed, catchments in terms of achieving water quality objectives.
The small catchment size means that close co-operation with landowners is likely to be more effective than in larger, dispersed, catchments in terms of achieving water quality objectives.
 
Approx. £90,000 has been spent on fencing and habitat works on this river since 2005 by the partner organisations.
Approx. £90,000 has been spent on fencing and habitat works on this river since 2005.
|Monitoring surveys and results=Long term monitoring of Margaritifera margaritifera numbers in this river indicate a continuing decline in adult numbers, in common with other Welsh rivers. This has been mostly linked to unsuitable river habitat, both due to physical modifications and some issues with water quality.  
|Monitoring surveys and results=Long term monitoring of Margaritifera margaritifera numbers in this river indicate a continuing decline in adult numbers, in common with other Welsh rivers. This has been mostly linked to unsuitable river habitat, both due to physical modifications and some issues with water quality.  
Monitoring of the success of the restoration work will in future be linked to NRWs use of the Redox potential measuring technique to determine the quality and cleanliness of the interstitial gravel which the juvenile stage of Margaritifera margaritifera rely upon. Monitoring indicates that the encystment stage of the Margaritifera margaritifera is occurring normally in this river, and that juvenile salmonid host numbers are good.
Monitoring of the success of the restoration work will in future be linked to NRWs use of the Redox potential measuring technique to determine the quality and cleanliness of the interstitial gravel which the juvenile stage of Margaritifera margaritifera rely upon. Monitoring indicates that the encystment stage of the Margaritifera margaritifera is occurring normally in this river, and that juvenile salmonid host numbers are good.

Revision as of 17:18, 27 November 2018

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 57' 36.89" N, 4° 8' 28.76" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring
Country Wales
Main contact forename Huw
Main contact surname Jones
Main contact user ID User:Huw Jones
Contact organisation Natural Resources Wales
Contact organisation web site http://naturalresources.wales/
Partner organisations Snowdonia National Park Authority, Welsh Government
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Restoration of the river

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This river was badly damaged by dredging / drainage operations in 1996/7. This work led to the discovery of a previously unknown population of Margaritifera margaritifera - the population was badly damaged by this work. Work to restore some sections of the Afon Ddu has been carried out by legacy Environment Agency Wales and Countryside Council for Wales and partner organisation Snowdonia National Park Authority since 2005. The bulk of this work concentrated on fencing out the river to reduce livestock access, but a short section of the most damaged section was restored in 2006. The river was designated as a pearl mussel Site of Special Scientific Interest in 2010/11. Since the formation of Natural Resources Wales, further work has been carried out with the aim of restoring in channel geomorphology, through the replacement of boulders and gravel seeding with an objective of improving the habitat for salmonids and Margaritifera margaritifera. The small catchment size means that close co-operation with landowners is likely to be more effective than in larger, dispersed, catchments in terms of achieving water quality objectives. Approx. £90,000 has been spent on fencing and habitat works on this river since 2005 by the partner organisations.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Long term monitoring of Margaritifera margaritifera numbers in this river indicate a continuing decline in adult numbers, in common with other Welsh rivers. This has been mostly linked to unsuitable river habitat, both due to physical modifications and some issues with water quality. Monitoring of the success of the restoration work will in future be linked to NRWs use of the Redox potential measuring technique to determine the quality and cleanliness of the interstitial gravel which the juvenile stage of Margaritifera margaritifera rely upon. Monitoring indicates that the encystment stage of the Margaritifera margaritifera is occurring normally in this river, and that juvenile salmonid host numbers are good.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Landowner buy and suitable catchment management is essential, and there is a high uptake of the Welsh Government's Glasdir Agri-Environment scheme in this small catchment. Successful captive rearing of juvenile mussels at the NRW Aquaculture Unit at Cynrig is considered to be an important future development to secure the future of the species.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information