Case study:Rehabilitation of Benta stream: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
|Location=47. | |Location=47.32073167961889, 18.924619741737843 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Project overview | {{Project overview | ||
|Status=Complete | |Status=Complete | ||
|Project web site url=www.kdvvizig.hu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=73:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&catid=83:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&Itemid=99 | |||
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity | |Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity | ||
|Country=Hungary | |Country=Hungary | ||
|Main contact forename=Norbertné | |Main contact forename=Norbertné | ||
|Main contact surname=Józsa | |Main contact surname=Józsa | ||
|Contact organisation=Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate | |Contact organisation=Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate | ||
|Multi-site=Yes | |Multi-site=Yes | ||
|Project summary=The investment was necessary because of the large amount of occasional and extreme amount of rainfalls and meltwaters caused serious problems in the surrounding communities for many years mainly because of the increased sediment deposition in the streambed. During the project, a total of 38 600 m3 sludge was removed from the steam. Landscape remediation was done on almost 50 thousand square meters of land. Spawning areas were constructed for native protected fish species, such as spined loach and weatherfish. | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Benta stream1.jpg | |||
|Caption=Benta stream_1 | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Benta stream2.jpg | |||
|Caption=Benta stram_2 | |||
}} | |||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case_study_subcatchment | {{Case_study_subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment= | ||
Line 75: | Line 84: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Project started=2008/08/01 | |||
|Works started=2009/06/01 | |||
|Works completed=2011/05/01 | |||
|Total cost category=1000 - 5000 k€ | |||
|Project started= | |Total1 cost=2463 k€ | ||
|Funding sources=Operational Program of New Hungary Development Plan, European Union | |||
|Works started= | |Investigation and design Lead organisation=Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate | ||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate | |||
|Works completed= | |Works and supervision Lead organisation=Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate | ||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate | |||
|Total cost category= | |||
|Total1 cost= | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
|Investigation and design Lead organisation= | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation= | |||
|Works and supervision Lead organisation= | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation= | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
Line 162: | Line 112: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Renewal of reventments,Removal of sediment,Planting,Creation of fish spawn nursing places,Creation of pipelines | ||
|Other technical measure=Reparation of sluice gates | |||
|Management interventions=channel maintenance | |||
|Social measures=Floodprotection,landenhancement | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Information provision | |||
|Other technical measure= | |||
|Management interventions= | |||
|Social measures= | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | ||
Line 286: | Line 225: | ||
{{Monitoring_documents}} | {{Monitoring_documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring_documents_end}} | {{Monitoring_documents_end}} | ||
{{ | {{Additional_Documents}} | ||
{{ | {{Additional_Documents_end}} | ||
| | {{Additional links and references header}} | ||
| | {{Additional links and references | ||
|Link=okologia.mta.hu/en | |||
|Description=Centre for Ecological Research HAS - The institute network of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences is set to produce values for both national and international success in Hungarian and universal science. The Centre's primary aim is to play a fundamental role in promoting the common weal and in building the foundation for the future through valuable scientific achievements based on highly promising discovery research. The Centre consists of three institutes, the Balaton Limnological Institute, the Danube Research Institute and the Institute of Ecology and Botany. | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=www.ovf.hu/ | |||
|Description=General Driectorate of Water Management - General Directorate of Water Management (OVF) is a background institution of the Ministry of Interior. It supports the work of the Minister regarding the flood management. Its main task is the coordination of flood hazard prevention, river control and flood protection activities, and the management of development projects concerning water bodies. OVF has 12 regional directorates which are coordinating the catchment management planning according to the requirements of the EU WFD. They take preventive and protective measures against floods, carry out status assessments and are the leading organizations in the management and implementation of river restoration projects. | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=neki.gov.hu/ | |||
|Description=National Institute for Environment - The National Institute for Environment (NeKI) is a background institution of the Ministry of Rural Development, and assists the Minister in the various duties of water management, environmental protection and nature conservation. NeKI has 12 regional branch offices, and is in charge of the strategies, policies and regulations regarding the management and exploitation of water resources. It performs environmental monitoring, status and impact assessments, administrates the national network for hydrological, hydrographical, hydrogeological and quality measurements of public waters. NeKI also coordinates the planning and the implementation of national and EU projects. | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=www.orszagoszoldhatosag.gov.hu/index_en.php | |||
|Description=National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water - The Inspectorate attends to administrational and water management matters, to analyses and consideration of law proposals in its field, and it supervises its 10 regional inspectorates as well. It coordinates international co-operations and takes part in the tasks connected to the EU integration. The regional inspectorates and two sub-offices are the 'green authorities' at first instance. The regional inspectorates are responsible for registration, monitoring, protection, conservation, reconstruction, rehabilitation, authorization and penalty processes regarding environment, nature and water in their assigned territory. | |||
}} | |||
{{Additional links and references | |||
|Link=wwf.hu/en | |||
|Description=WWF Hungary - WWF Hungary is the Hungarian arm of the WWF Network and was founded in 1991. It's main aims are protecting the biodiversity of Hungary by focusing on freshwaters, forests and priority species. They are also fighting against climate change and they support WWF's conservation work as well. They participated in the development of the Danube Strategy, as well as organized conservation projects on Hungary's two largest rivers, the Tisza and the Danube. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Additional links and references | ||
| | |Link=www.icpdr.org/main/ | ||
| | |Description=International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) - The ICPDR is an International Organisation consisting of 14 cooperating states and the European Union. Since its establishment in 1998, the ICPDR has grown into one of the largest and most active international bodies of river basin management expertise in Europe. The ICPDR deals not only with the Danube itself, but also with the whole Danube River Basin, which includes its tributaries and the ground water resources. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | {{Additional_links_and_references_footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary_Information | {{Supplementary_Information | ||
Line 316: | Line 269: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case_study_upload}} | {{Case_study_upload}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 13:08, 1 November 2018
Location: 47° 19' 14.63" N, 18° 55' 28.63" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.kdvvizig.hu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=73:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&catid=83:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&Itemid=99 |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Hungary |
Main contact forename | Norbertné |
Main contact surname | Józsa |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
The investment was necessary because of the large amount of occasional and extreme amount of rainfalls and meltwaters caused serious problems in the surrounding communities for many years mainly because of the increased sediment deposition in the streambed. During the project, a total of 38 600 m3 sludge was removed from the steam. Landscape remediation was done on almost 50 thousand square meters of land. Spawning areas were constructed for native protected fish species, such as spined loach and weatherfish.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|