Case study:Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case_study_status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 15: Line 15:
|Contact organisation url=www.rowater.ro/daprut/default.aspx
|Contact organisation url=www.rowater.ro/daprut/default.aspx
|Partner organisations=University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies; Romania Romanian Ornithological Society; Galaţi Forestry District,
|Partner organisations=University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies; Romania Romanian Ornithological Society; Galaţi Forestry District,
|Name of parent multi-site project=Lower Prut Floodplain Ecological Restoration of the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case study:Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake
|Multi-site=Yes
|Multi-site=Yes
|Project picture=Vlascuta Lake present situation.JPG
|Project picture=Vlascuta Lake present situation.JPG
Line 22: Line 22:
The results of the project are linked by the designation of Vlascuta Lake as Special Protected Area NATURA 2000 within The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park.  
The results of the project are linked by the designation of Vlascuta Lake as Special Protected Area NATURA 2000 within The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park.  
Through the ecological restoration works at  Vlascuta Lake, the water level is maintained so the habitats are protected as in drought period so in the floods ones.
Through the ecological restoration works at  Vlascuta Lake, the water level is maintained so the habitats are protected as in drought period so in the floods ones.
The rehabilitation of the two channels, which connect Pochina Lake and Prut River, respectively the water supply channel (362 m) and evacuation channel (235 m) and removal of mud from of about 2000 sqm surface of lake, the worst part of the lake.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta area before works 1.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta area before works
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta area before works 2.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta area before works
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta area during the works.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta area during the works
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta channels during works 1.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta channel during the works (1)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta channels during works 2.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta channel during the works (2)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta area after restoration.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta area after restoration
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta lake.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta Lake
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=
Line 79: Line 113:
        
        
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Project started=2005/11/01
   
|Works started=2009/08/01
   
|Works completed=2009/11/01
     
|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€
|Project started=
|Total1 cost=79 k€
      2005/11/01
|Funding sources=Ministry of Environment and County Council Galati,Regional Agency for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati), EU LIFE Programme,
|Works started=
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Regional Agenty for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati)
      2009/08/01
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Fica
|Works completed=
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Boldea
      2009/11/01
|Works1 and supervision cost category=Less than 1 k€
|Project completed=
|Wrk and supervision cost=0.664 k€
     
|Total cost category=
      50 - 100 k€
|Total1 cost=
      79 k€
|Funding sources=
      From LIFE Nature Programm; Co-financig Ministry of Environment and County Council Galati,Regional Agenty for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati)
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
     
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
     
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
      Regional Agenty for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati)
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
      Fica
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
      Boldea
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
      Less than 1 k€
|Wrk and supervision cost=
      0.664 k€
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
     
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
     
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
     
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
Line 166: Line 141:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Removal of sediment,
   
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Information provision
   
     
|Floodplain / River corridor=
     
|Planform / Channel pattern=
     
|Other technical measure=
      The rehabilitation of the two channels, witch connect Pochina Lake and Prut River, respectively the water supply channel (362 m) and evacuation channel (235 m) and removal of mud from of about 2000 sqm surface of lake, the worst part of the lake.
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
     
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
      Information provision
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
Line 212: Line 173:
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta area before works 1.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta area before works
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta area before works 2.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta area before works
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta area during the works.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta area during the works
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta channels during works 1.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta channel during the works (1)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta channels during works 2.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta channel during the works (2)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta area after restoration.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta area after restoration
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Vlascuta lake.JPG
|Caption=Vlascuta Lake
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Case study documents
{{Case study documents
Line 284: Line 215:
}}
}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 12:48, 1 November 2018

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 45° 46' 39.38" N, 28° 8' 50.41" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.luncaprut.ro
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Romania
Main contact forename Fica
Main contact surname Boldea
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
Contact organisation web site http://www.rowater.ro/daprut/default.aspx
Partner organisations University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies; Romania Romanian Ornithological Society; Galaţi Forestry District
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park is the entrance of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. It is the nesting site for more than a hundred bird species, and also a resting/wintering place for many of the passing migratory birds. More than 50 of these birds are listed in the EU Birds Directive and in the Bern Convention. The project objective was to improve the conservation status of 13 priority and more than 50 non-priority bird species listed in the Birds Directive and present in the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park. The results of the project are linked by the designation of Vlascuta Lake as Special Protected Area NATURA 2000 within The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park. Through the ecological restoration works at Vlascuta Lake, the water level is maintained so the habitats are protected as in drought period so in the floods ones.

The rehabilitation of the two channels, which connect Pochina Lake and Prut River, respectively the water supply channel (362 m) and evacuation channel (235 m) and removal of mud from of about 2000 sqm surface of lake, the worst part of the lake.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Vlascuta area before works
Vlascuta area before works
Vlascuta area during the works
Vlascuta channel during the works (1)
Vlascuta channel during the works (2)
Vlascuta area after restoration
Vlascuta Lake
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Prut Barlad

Subcatchment

River name Prut
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Eastern Plains
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ecological Restoration of Mata-Radeanu Complex, Ecological Restoration of Natural Lake Pochina, The Ciobarciu Wetland Project


Site

Name Vlascuta Lake
WFD water body codes ROLW13.1_B5.2
WFD (national) typology ROLN01
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Side ponds
Reference morphology Single channel, Supply channel and discharge channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation EU - Special Protected Area
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Silt, Sedimentary rocks (mixture of sand and mud of fluviatile origin).
River corridor land use Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2005/11/01
Works started 2009/08/01
Works completed 2009/11/01
Project completed
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€) 79 k€79,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Ministry of Environment and County Council Galati, Regional Agency for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati), EU LIFE Programme

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication Regional Agenty for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati) Fica Boldea
Works and works supervision Less than 1 k€ 0.664 k€664 € <br />
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation
Biology
Physico-chemical Oxygen balance
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Removal of sediment
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Information provision


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Width & depth variation Improvement

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.wise-rtd.info Water Knowledge Portal
http://www.mmediu.ro Web-site of The Romanian Ministry of Environment and Forests
http://www.ser.org Web-site of The Society for Ecological Restoration

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information