Case study:Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.rowater.ro/daprut/default.aspx | |Contact organisation url=www.rowater.ro/daprut/default.aspx | ||
|Partner organisations=University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies; Romania Romanian Ornithological Society; Galaţi Forestry District, | |Partner organisations=University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies; Romania Romanian Ornithological Society; Galaţi Forestry District, | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project= | |Name of parent multi-site project=Case study:Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake | ||
|Multi-site=Yes | |Multi-site=Yes | ||
|Project picture=Vlascuta Lake present situation.JPG | |Project picture=Vlascuta Lake present situation.JPG | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The results of the project are linked by the designation of Vlascuta Lake as Special Protected Area NATURA 2000 within The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park. | The results of the project are linked by the designation of Vlascuta Lake as Special Protected Area NATURA 2000 within The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park. | ||
Through the ecological restoration works at Vlascuta Lake, the water level is maintained so the habitats are protected as in drought period so in the floods ones. | Through the ecological restoration works at Vlascuta Lake, the water level is maintained so the habitats are protected as in drought period so in the floods ones. | ||
The rehabilitation of the two channels, which connect Pochina Lake and Prut River, respectively the water supply channel (362 m) and evacuation channel (235 m) and removal of mud from of about 2000 sqm surface of lake, the worst part of the lake. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Vlascuta area before works 1.JPG | |||
|Caption=Vlascuta area before works | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Vlascuta area before works 2.JPG | |||
|Caption=Vlascuta area before works | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Vlascuta area during the works.JPG | |||
|Caption=Vlascuta area during the works | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Vlascuta channels during works 1.JPG | |||
|Caption=Vlascuta channel during the works (1) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Vlascuta channels during works 2.JPG | |||
|Caption=Vlascuta channel during the works (2) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Vlascuta area after restoration.JPG | |||
|Caption=Vlascuta area after restoration | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Vlascuta lake.JPG | |||
|Caption=Vlascuta Lake | |||
}} | |||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case_study_subcatchment | {{Case_study_subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment= | ||
Line 79: | Line 113: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Project started=2005/11/01 | |||
|Works started=2009/08/01 | |||
|Works completed=2009/11/01 | |||
|Total cost category=50 - 100 k€ | |||
|Project started= | |Total1 cost=79 k€ | ||
|Funding sources=Ministry of Environment and County Council Galati,Regional Agency for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati), EU LIFE Programme, | |||
|Works started= | |Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Regional Agenty for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati) | ||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Fica | |||
|Works completed= | |Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Boldea | ||
|Works1 and supervision cost category=Less than 1 k€ | |||
|Wrk and supervision cost=0.664 k€ | |||
|Total cost category= | |||
|Total1 cost= | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation= | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename= | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname= | |||
|Works1 and supervision cost category= | |||
|Wrk and supervision cost= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
Line 166: | Line 141: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Removal of sediment, | ||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Information provision | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | ||
Line 212: | Line 173: | ||
{{Monitoring_documents}} | {{Monitoring_documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring_documents_end}} | {{Monitoring_documents_end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Case study documents | {{Case study documents | ||
Line 284: | Line 215: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case_study_upload}} | {{Case_study_upload}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 12:48, 1 November 2018
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.luncaprut.ro |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Romania |
Main contact forename | Fica |
Main contact surname | Boldea |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.rowater.ro/daprut/default.aspx |
Partner organisations | University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies; Romania Romanian Ornithological Society; Galaţi Forestry District |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake |
Project summary
The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park is the entrance of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. It is the nesting site for more than a hundred bird species, and also a resting/wintering place for many of the passing migratory birds. More than 50 of these birds are listed in the EU Birds Directive and in the Bern Convention.
The project objective was to improve the conservation status of 13 priority and more than 50 non-priority bird species listed in the Birds Directive and present in the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park.
The results of the project are linked by the designation of Vlascuta Lake as Special Protected Area NATURA 2000 within The Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park.
Through the ecological restoration works at Vlascuta Lake, the water level is maintained so the habitats are protected as in drought period so in the floods ones.
The rehabilitation of the two channels, which connect Pochina Lake and Prut River, respectively the water supply channel (362 m) and evacuation channel (235 m) and removal of mud from of about 2000 sqm surface of lake, the worst part of the lake.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ecological Restoration of Mata-Radeanu Complex, Ecological Restoration of Natural Lake Pochina, The Ciobarciu Wetland Project
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|