Case study:Experimental flood in the Cardener river: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
|Location=42.1812718, 1.5836394000000382
|Location=42.1195448, 1.6038527000000613
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
Line 13: Line 13:
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=The Sectorial Plan of Environmental Flows (ACA, 2005) requires the
|Project summary=The Sectorial Plan of Environmental Flows (ACA, 2005) requires the
annual release of one effective discharge from the dam, in order to
annual release of one effective discharge from the dam (the Llosa del Cavall Dam), in order to
protect or improve the “dynamic equilibrium of the river.” This
protect or improve the “dynamic equilibrium of the river.” This
controlled release lasts 24 h, and its seasonality is linked to the natural
controlled release lasts 24 h, and its seasonality is linked to the natural
Line 101: Line 101:
|Other motivation=To protect or improve the “dynamic equilibrium of the river.”
|Other motivation=To protect or improve the “dynamic equilibrium of the river.”
}}
}}
{{Measures}}
{{Measures
|Management interventions=Experimental flood
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{End table}}
{{End table}}

Latest revision as of 14:01, 24 July 2018

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 42° 7' 10.36" N, 1° 36' 13.87" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country Spain
Main contact forename Fernando
Main contact surname Magdaleno
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Sectorial Plan of Environmental Flows (ACA, 2005) requires the annual release of one effective discharge from the dam (the Llosa del Cavall Dam), in order to protect or improve the “dynamic equilibrium of the river.” This controlled release lasts 24 h, and its seasonality is linked to the natural period of occurrence of ordinary floods in the river. Presently, the Plan defines a peak discharge of 8.4 m3 /s for the controlled flood. Ramping rates are defined as follows (t indicates 1-h time gaps):

• Rising limb: Qt+1 (maximum) = 1.8Qt

• Recession limb: Qt+1 (minimum) = 0.7Qt

To study the adequacy of this value, the Catalan Water Agency (with support from the Technical University of Catalonia) decided to comparatively monitor in 2015 the effects of three different peak flows that were lower than the 2-year recurrence flood (i.e., 4, 8, and 12 m3 /s; Pallarés and Martín-Vide, 2015; Fig. 3). The first and smaller flood was released between March 3 and 4, the second was released between April 13 and 15, and the third and larger was released between June 15 and 16. The base environmental flow released from the dam is commonly around 1.5 m3 /s.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Analyses of the ecomorphological effects of the controlled flood in the Cardener River were based on monitored changes in river morphology, suspended load transport, and bedload transport (Pallarés and Martín-Vide, 2015). Changes in rivermorphology were quantified by determining geomorphic variation at a number of channel sections along the study sub-reach. Suspended sediments were sampled pre- and post-event at different channel locations. Bedload changes were analysed by (i.) colouring portions of gravel bars with spray and tracing the modifications, and (ii.) measuring shifts in the granulometric curves of selected channel sites after flood occurrence. Other observations made included a visible assessment of the changes in trophic conditions, riverbed armoring, and an assessment of the IHF index (Pardo et al., 2002).

Main morphologic changes found under post-event conditions occurred in the river sub-reach closer to the dam toe. During the managed floods with higher flows (i.e., 8 and 12 m3 /s), erosion rates reached 1.16 m3 per linear meter at the upper sampled station (width = 16.5 m). Changes were especially pronounced in the riffle areas. By contrast, lower stations did not show any major morphological changes, and the 4 m3 /s event did not result in significant morphological activity in the channel.

Suspended transport was relatively pronounced during the 8 and 12 m3 /s events; suspended sediment concentrations reached 0.22–0.37 g/l at some sampling sites. This fine load was generated inside the study reach, mostly from the immediacy of the dam, and did not stem from the upper basin. With respect to bedload, significant transport of particles occurred during the three flood events. The extent of transport was greater (and the size of the transported particles bigger) for the higher-flow flood events. Granulometric analyses showed an increase in grain size in the riverbed, and a reduction (or elimination) of clogging conditions by fine sediments.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


In summary and according to Pallarés and Martín-Vide (2015), ecogeomorphic activation of the 7-km long study reach may be optimised by the release of 12 m3 /s flooding events; a peak rate higher than the present legally defined rate of 8.4 m3 /s. Suspended and bedload transports are particularly relevant at rates of 8 m3 /s and higher; especially in the sampling sites closer to the dam toe. However, both types of transport could be primarily associated with in-thechannel sources, which could be progressively hampered by the existing lack of upstream inputs. Habitat conditions exhibited a limited positive trend with increasing discharge. On the basis of these findings, the authors suggested that larger peak discharges could be desirable, but would also require the implementation of measures for increasing sediment discharge from the dam in order to avoid progressive incision and further sediment shortages along the study reach.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Hydropower
Hydromorphology Continuity of sediment transport, Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project To protect or improve the “dynamic equilibrium of the river.”


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Experimental flood
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901117301545 All information on this page is copied from this article written by Fernando Magdaleno.

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information

References

Agència Catalana de l’Aigua (ACA), 2005. Pla Sectorial de Cabals de Manteniment de les conques internes de Catalunya. Generalitat de Catalunya; Departament de Medi ambient i Habitatge

Pallarés, A., Martín-Vide, J.P., 2015. Efectes de l'alliberament de cabal generador a preses de Catalunya. Treball Final de Grau. Marítima i Ambiental, Escola Técnica Superior d́ Enginyeria de Camins, Canals y Ports. Departament d’Enginyera Hidràulica, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona (83 p.).

Pardo, I., Álvarez, M., Casas, J., Moreno, J.L., Vivas, S., Bonada, N., Alba-Tercedor, J., Jáimez-Cuéllar, P., Moyà, G., Prat, N., Robles, S., Suárez, M.L., Toro, M., VidalAbarca, M.R., 2002. El hábitat de los ríos mediterráneos: Diseño de un índice de diversidad de hábitat. Limnetica 21 (3-4), 115–133

For more references, please check the article link above.