Case study:The Ciobarciu Wetland Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
The Ciobarciu Wetland was created in October 2006 after first flooding of this area.
The Ciobarciu Wetland was created in October 2006 after first flooding of this area.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Ciobarciu area past situation.jpg
|Caption=Ciobarciu area - before restoration
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Ciobarciu wetland during restoration.JPG
|Caption=Ciobarciu area - during restoration
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Ciobarciu area after restoration (1).JPG
|Caption=Ciobarciu area - after restoration (1)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Ciobarciu Wetland after restoration (2).JPG
|Caption=Ciobarciu area - after restoration (2)
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=
Line 45: Line 66:
|Avrg channel gradient=0.001
|Avrg channel gradient=0.001
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project background
|Reach length directly affected=
|Reach length directly affected=5,500 m
   
|Project started=2003/03/01
   
|Works started=2006/06/01
      5,500 m
|Works completed=2006/10/01
|Project started=
|Total cost category=100 - 500 k€
      2003/03/01
|Total1 cost=388 k€
|Works started=
|Funding sources=The Netherlands Government programme MATRA; Co-financing Ministry of Environment and Water Management
      2006/06/01
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=Regional water authority Hunze & Aa’s www.hunzeenaas.nl
|Works completed=
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=Albert
      2006/10/01
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=Remmelzwaal
|Project completed=
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
     
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=Dan
|Total cost category=
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=Badarau
      100 - 500 k€
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
|Total1 cost=
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=Anca
      388 k€
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=Savin
|Funding sources=
|Monitoring Lead organisation=Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
      The Netherlands Gouvernment program
MATRA; Co-financing Ministry of Environment and Water Management
|Investigation and design cost category=
     
|Invst and design cost=
     
|Investigation and design Lead organisation=
      Regional water authority Hunze & Aa’s www.hunzeenaas.nl
|Investigation and design Other contact forename=
      Albert
|Investigation and design Other contact surname=
      Remmelzwaal
|Stakeholder1 engagement cost category=
     
|stk engagement cost=
     
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=
      Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact forename=
      Dan
|Stakeholder engagement Other contact surname=
      Badarau
|Works1 and supervision cost category=
     
|Wrk and supervision cost=
     
|Works and supervision Lead organisation=
      Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
|Works and supervision Other contact forename=
      Anca
|Works and supervision Other contact surname=
      Savin
|Post-project1 management and maintenance cost category=
     
|Post-project2 management and maintenance cost=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=
     
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=
     
|Monitoring1 cost category=
     
|Monitoring2 cost=
     
|Monitoring Lead organisation=
      Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
|Monitoring Other contact forename=
     
|Monitoring Other contact surname=
     
|Supplementary funding information=
     
}}
}}
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
Line 133: Line 100:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland, Removal of embankments,
   
|Planform / Channel pattern=Re-instatement of old course
   
|Other technical measure=Improvement of natural flows,
     
|Social measures=Improved public access, Land purchase,
|Floodplain / River corridor=
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Consultation
      Creation of wetlands/removal of embankments
|Planform / Channel pattern=
      Re-instatement of old course
|Other technical measure=
      Restoration flow on old Jijia
|Management interventions=
     
|Social measures=
      Land purchase/Improved public access
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=
      Consultation
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}}
Line 203: Line 159:
}}
}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Ciobarciu area past situation.jpg
|Caption=Ciobarciu area - before restoration
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Ciobarciu wetland during restoration.JPG
|Caption=Ciobarciu area - during restoration
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Ciobarciu area after restoration (1).JPG
|Caption=Ciobarciu area - after restoration (1)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Ciobarciu Wetland after restoration (2).JPG
|Caption=Ciobarciu area - after restoration (2)
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
Line 235: Line 173:
{{Supplementary_Information
{{Supplementary_Information
|Information=
|Information=
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 12:04, 5 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 47° 2' 56.12" N, 27° 51' 34.74" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.ciobarciu.ro
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Romania
Main contact forename Anca
Main contact surname Savin
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
Contact organisation web site http://www.apeprut.ro
Partner organisations Institute for Inland Water Management RIZA, Regional Water Board Hunze&Aa's, Het Drentse Landschap (NGO for nature management)
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Ciobarciu Wetland - present situation

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Ciobarciu Wetland Project is an ecological rehabilitation project in the valley of the river Prut. In order to prevent flooding and to extend agricultural surfaces, the common floodplain of Prut and Jijia was embanked. Jijia river course was deviated by digging a channel to the Prut at Chiperesti. The last 56 km of the Jijia river, which is parallel to the Prut, has been cut-off (it is now known as the Old Jijia). The Old Jijia can be supplied with water from the Jijia by the hydrotechnical knot at Chiperesti when needed. Otherwise, the Old Jijia is only supplied from its own river basin by four small tributaries with intermittent flow. The Ciobarciu Wetland was created in October 2006 after first flooding of this area.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Ciobarciu area - before restoration
Ciobarciu area - during restoration
Ciobarciu area - after restoration (1)
Ciobarciu area - after restoration (2)
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Prut Barlad

Subcatchment

River name Prut
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Eastern Plains
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ecological Restoration of Mata-Radeanu Complex, Ecological Restoration of Natural Lake Pochina, Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake


Site

Name Ciobarciu
WFD water body codes RORW13.1.15_B5
WFD (national) typology RO09a
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Embanked
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation EU - Special Protected Area
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Silt
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category Less than 2 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient 0.001
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 5,500 m5.5 km <br />550,000 cm <br />
Project started 2003/03/01
Works started 2006/06/01
Works completed 2006/10/01
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 388 k€388,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources The Netherlands Government programme MATRA; Co-financing Ministry of Environment and Water Management

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Regional water authority Hunze & Aa’s www.hunzeenaas.nl Albert Remmelzwaal
Stakeholder engagement and communication Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority Dan Badarau
Works and works supervision Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority Anca Savin
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of wetland, Removal of embankments
Planform / Channel pattern Re-instatement of old course
Other Improvement of natural flows
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Improved public access, Land purchase
Other Consultation


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Continuity for organisms Improvement

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.ciobarciu.ro The website of the project
http://www.apeprut.ro The website of Prut River Basin Water Administration

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information