Case study:The Fortuna Restoration Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:


}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Fortuna-lake panoramio com.jpg
|Caption=Fortuna lake location (source: www.panoramio.com)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Fisherman on Lake Fortuna - Danube Delta.jpg
|Caption=Fisherman on Lake Fortuna (source: www.panoramio.com)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Intrare pe lac vanatorul.ro.jpg
|Caption=Intrance on the Rortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Restoration works.jpg
|Caption=Restoration works in the Danube Delta (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Fortuna project.jpg
|Caption=Fortuna project (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Lebede pe lac vanatorul.ro.jpg
|Caption=Awans on th Fortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Lacul Fortuna, iulie 2011 Praporgicu Traian.jpg
|Caption=Fortuna Lake, July 2011 (source:Praporgicu Traian)
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment
|Subcatchment=
|Subcatchment=
Line 87: Line 120:
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank
|Planform / Channel pattern=Connecting agricultural polder Fortuna to the Danube regime
|Planform / Channel pattern=Reconnecting polder,
}}
}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
Line 224: Line 257:
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Monitoring_documents_end}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Fortuna-lake panoramio com.jpg
|Caption=Fortuna lake location (source: www.panoramio.com)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Fisherman on Lake Fortuna - Danube Delta.jpg
|Caption=Fisherman on Lake Fortuna (source: www.panoramio.com)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Intrare pe lac vanatorul.ro.jpg
|Caption=Intrance on the Rortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Restoration works.jpg
|Caption=Restoration works in the Danube Delta (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Fortuna project.jpg
|Caption=Fortuna project (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Lebede pe lac vanatorul.ro.jpg
|Caption=Awans on th Fortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Lacul Fortuna, iulie 2011 Praporgicu Traian.jpg
|Caption=Fortuna Lake, July 2011 (source:Praporgicu Traian)
}}
{{Image_gallery_end}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
{{Additional_Documents_end}}
Line 265: Line 268:
|Information=
|Information=
      
      
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Case_study_upload}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 09:46, 2 June 2017

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 45° 11' 28.43" N, 29° 8' 53.17" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country Romania
Main contact forename Marian
Main contact surname Tudor
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea
Contact organisation web site http://www.ddni.ro
Partner organisations The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Fortuna lake (source: www.infoturism.ro)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The aim of the project was to connecting agricultural polder Fortuna (2,115 ha) to the Danube regime. Restoration of hydrological regime and hydrological functions means for this area, restoring and establishing the following functions: - habitat for plants and animals typical alluvial areas; - habitat and breeding area for fish and aquatic birds; - reservoir for biodiversity and providing genetic resources; - biocoridor and genetic exchange; - organic production; - biogeochemical circuit elements; - retention of sediments and pollutions; - Black Sea biofilter

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Fortuna lake location (source: www.panoramio.com)
Fisherman on Lake Fortuna (source: www.panoramio.com)
Intrance on the Rortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
Restoration works in the Danube Delta (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net)
Fortuna project (source: Orhan Ibram, www.slideshare.net
Awans on th Fortuna Lake (source: www.vanatorul.ro)
Fortuna Lake, July 2011 (source:Praporgicu Traian)
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin

Subcatchment

River name Sulina Branch
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2) 2.115 km²211.5 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 1.50 m0.0015 km <br />150 cm <br />
Dominant geology Organic (i.e. Peat), clay
Ecoregion Pontic Province
Dominant land cover Grassland, Reed
Waterbody ID



Site

Name Forestry polder Fortuna
WFD water body codes RORW14.1_B5
WFD (national) typology RO15
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Embanked, Forestry area
Reference morphology Sinuous, Artificial channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation International - RAMSAR site
Local/regional site designations Biosphere Reserves
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated, Floodplain area
Dominant substrate Clay, Peat
River corridor land use Grassland, Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 15.0015 m <br />0.015 km <br />1,500 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m) 1.5 m0.0015 km <br />150 cm <br />
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 69.769.7 m³/s <br />69,700 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient 0.015
Average unit stream power (W/m2) 683.5479683.548 W/m² <br />


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 1999/12/01
Works started 2004/03/01
Works completed 2004/11/01
Project completed
Total cost category more than 10000 k€
Total cost (k€) 2093000 k€2,093,000,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources GEF – BM Programe

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea Marian Tudor
Stakeholder engagement and communication The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Works and works supervision The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Post-project management and maintenance The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Monitoring The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro) Marian Tudor



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Continuity for organisms, Width & depth variation
Biology Fish, Macrophytes, Phytoplankton
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Create breaches in the bank
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Reconnecting polder
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow No Yes No No No Improvement
Continuity of sediment transport No No No No No

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes No No No No Improvement
Invertebrates No Yes No No No
Macrophytes No No No No No
Phytoplankton No No No No No


Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Nutrient concentrations Yes No No No No Improvement
Salinity No Yes No No No
Oxygen balance No No No No No
Temperature No No No No No
PH No No No No No

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes No No No No Improvement
Pastures No No No No No
Reed No No No No No
Medicinal plants No No No No No


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.ddni.ro The website of the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development (DDNIRD)

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information