Case study:The Cernovca Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism. | Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Satellite image of Cernovca area 1993.jpg | |||
|Caption=Satellite image of Cernovca area (1993) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Satellite image of Cernovca area 1996.jpg | |||
|Caption=Satellite image of Cernovca area (1996) | |||
}} | |||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case_study_subcatchment | {{Case_study_subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment= | ||
Line 75: | Line 88: | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of | |Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Reconnecting | |Planform / Channel pattern=Reconnecting polder | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | ||
Line 177: | Line 190: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
{{ | {{Other responses header}} | ||
{{ | {{Other response table row | ||
|Element= | |Element=Important biogeochemical role for nutrient retention andcycling. | ||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
biogeochemical role for nutrient retention | |Result=Improvement | ||
}} | |||
|Monitored before= | {{Other response table row | ||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored after= | |Monitored before=No | ||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring= | |Qualitative monitoring=No | ||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring= | |Control site used=No | ||
}} | |||
|Control site used= | {{Other response table row | ||
|Element=Pastures | |||
| | |Monitored before=No | ||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Reed | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Medicinal plants | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
Line 207: | Line 239: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Monitoring_documents_end}} | {{Monitoring_documents_end}} | ||
{{Additional_Documents}} | {{Additional_Documents}} | ||
{{Additional_Documents_end}} | {{Additional_Documents_end}} | ||
Line 228: | Line 251: | ||
|Information= | |Information= | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case_study_upload}} | {{Case_study_upload}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 09:45, 2 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Romania |
Main contact forename | Marian |
Main contact surname | Tudor |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.ddni.ro |
Partner organisations | The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Until the 20th century vast areas of the Danube Delta faced only minimal human impacts through extensive fishery and reed harvesting. Since then the Danube Delta has undergone multiple human impacts like embankment, channelization and drainage. Moreover, large areas were diked and the polders used for agriculture.
The Cernovca polder (1.580ha) was reconnected to the Danube in 1996, and recovery has been monitored by the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development Tulcea.
Within a few years a redevelopment of the site-specific biodiversity occurred and ecosystem services like nutrient retention and fish recruitment became obvious.
Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: The Babina Restoration Project
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationFunding sources for post-project management and maintenance came from national budget.
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|