Case study:The Cernovca Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism. | Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Satellite image of Cernovca area 1993.jpg | |||
|Caption=Satellite image of Cernovca area (1993) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Satellite image of Cernovca area 1996.jpg | |||
|Caption=Satellite image of Cernovca area (1996) | |||
}} | |||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case_study_subcatchment | {{Case_study_subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment= | ||
Line 30: | Line 43: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Site | {{Site | ||
|Name= | |Name=Agricultural polder Cernovca | ||
|WFD water body code=RORW14.1_B6 | |||
|WFD (national) typology=RO15 | |||
|Pre-project morphology=Embanked, Agricultural land | |||
|WFD water body code= | |Reference morphology=Sinuous, Artificial channel | ||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|WFD (national) typology= | |Site designation=International - RAMSAR site | ||
|Local site designation=Biosphere Reserves | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
|Pre-project morphology= | |Dominant hydrology=Artificially regulated, Wetland | ||
|Dominant substrate=Sand, Clay | |||
|Reference morphology= | |River corridor land use=Grassland, Wetland | ||
|Average bankfull channel width category=10 - 50 m | |||
|Heavily modified water body= | |Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m | ||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=1.50 | |||
| | |Mean discharge category=more than 1000 m³/s | ||
|Mn discharge=3606 | |||
| | |Avrg channel gradient=0.015 | ||
|Protected species present= | |||
|Invasive species present= | |||
|Dominant hydrology= | |||
|Dominant substrate= | |||
|River corridor land use= | |||
|Average bankfull channel width category= | |||
|Average bankfull channel depth category= | |||
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth= | |||
|Mean discharge category= | |||
|Mn discharge= | |||
|Avrg channel gradient= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Project background | ||
|Project started=1991/01/01 | |||
|Works started=1996/01/01 | |||
|Works completed=1996/01/01 | |||
|Total cost category=1 - 10 k€ | |||
|Project started= | |Total1 cost=5654 | ||
|Funding sources=GEF biodiversity preservation project in the Danube Delta | |||
|Works started= | |Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation=The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea | ||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation=The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro) | |||
|Works completed= | |Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename=Marian | ||
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname=Tudor | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation=The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro) | |||
|Monitoring Other contact forename=Marian | |||
|Total cost category= | |Monitoring Other contact surname=Tudor | ||
|Supplementary funding information=Funding sources for post-project management and maintenance came from national budget. | |||
|Total1 cost= | |||
|Funding sources= | |||
|Stakeholder engagement Lead organisation= | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Lead organisation= | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact forename= | |||
|Post-project management and maintenance Other contact surname= | |||
|Monitoring Lead organisation= | |||
|Monitoring Other contact forename= | |||
|Monitoring Other contact surname= | |||
|Supplementary funding information= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Motivations | {{Motivations | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements= | |Specific mitigation=Flood risk management | ||
|Hydromorphological quality elements=Continuity for organisms | |||
|Biological quality elements=Fish: Species composition | |||
|Physico-chemical quality elements=Nutrient concentrations | |||
|Biological quality elements= | |Other motivation=Landscape enhancement,Recreation | ||
|Physico-chemical quality elements= | |||
|Other motivation= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Reconnecting polder | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | ||
Line 205: | Line 112: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
{{ | {{Biological quality elements header}} | ||
{{ | {{Biological quality element table row | ||
|Element= | |Element=Fish: Species composition | ||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Monitored before= | |Result=Improvement | ||
}} | |||
|Monitored after= | {{Biological quality element table row | ||
|Element=Invertebrates | |||
|Qualitative monitoring= | |Monitored before=No | ||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring= | |Qualitative monitoring=Yes | ||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used= | |Control site used=No | ||
}} | |||
| | {{Biological quality element table row | ||
|Element=Macrophytes | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=Yes | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Biological quality element table row | |||
|Element=Phytoplankton | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
{{Physico- | {{Physico-chemical quality elements header}} | ||
{{Physico- | {{Physico-chemical quality element table row | ||
|Element= | |Element=Nutrient concentrations | ||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
|Monitored before= | |Result=Improvement | ||
}} | |||
|Monitored after= | {{Physico-chemical quality element table row | ||
|Element=Salinity | |||
|Qualitative monitoring= | |Monitored before=No | ||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Quantitative monitoring= | |Qualitative monitoring=No | ||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used= | |Control site used=No | ||
}} | |||
| | {{Physico-chemical quality element table row | ||
|Element=PH | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Oxygen balance | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Physico-chemical quality element table row | |||
|Element=Temperature | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
{{ | {{Other responses header}} | ||
{{ | {{Other response table row | ||
|Element= | |Element=Important biogeochemical role for nutrient retention andcycling. | ||
|Monitored before=Yes | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
biogeochemical role for nutrient retention | |Result=Improvement | ||
}} | |||
|Monitored before= | {{Other response table row | ||
|Element=Fish | |||
|Monitored after= | |Monitored before=No | ||
|Monitored after=Yes | |||
|Qualitative monitoring= | |Qualitative monitoring=No | ||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring= | |Control site used=No | ||
}} | |||
|Control site used= | {{Other response table row | ||
|Element=Pastures | |||
| | |Monitored before=No | ||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Reed | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Other response table row | |||
|Element=Medicinal plants | |||
|Monitored before=No | |||
|Monitored after=No | |||
|Qualitative monitoring=No | |||
|Quantitative monitoring=No | |||
|Control site used=No | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{End_table}} | {{End_table}} | ||
Line 279: | Line 239: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Monitoring_documents_end}} | {{Monitoring_documents_end}} | ||
{{Additional_Documents}} | {{Additional_Documents}} | ||
{{Additional_Documents_end}} | {{Additional_Documents_end}} | ||
Line 300: | Line 251: | ||
|Information= | |Information= | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case_study_upload}} | {{Case_study_upload}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 09:45, 2 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Romania |
Main contact forename | Marian |
Main contact surname | Tudor |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.ddni.ro |
Partner organisations | The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Until the 20th century vast areas of the Danube Delta faced only minimal human impacts through extensive fishery and reed harvesting. Since then the Danube Delta has undergone multiple human impacts like embankment, channelization and drainage. Moreover, large areas were diked and the polders used for agriculture.
The Cernovca polder (1.580ha) was reconnected to the Danube in 1996, and recovery has been monitored by the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development Tulcea.
Within a few years a redevelopment of the site-specific biodiversity occurred and ecosystem services like nutrient retention and fish recruitment became obvious.
Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: The Babina Restoration Project
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationFunding sources for post-project management and maintenance came from national budget.
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|