Case study:The Cernovca Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Create breaches in the bank | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland | |Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Reconnecting | |Planform / Channel pattern=Reconnecting polder | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Latest revision as of 09:45, 2 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Romania |
Main contact forename | Marian |
Main contact surname | Tudor |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.ddni.ro |
Partner organisations | The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Until the 20th century vast areas of the Danube Delta faced only minimal human impacts through extensive fishery and reed harvesting. Since then the Danube Delta has undergone multiple human impacts like embankment, channelization and drainage. Moreover, large areas were diked and the polders used for agriculture.
The Cernovca polder (1.580ha) was reconnected to the Danube in 1996, and recovery has been monitored by the Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development Tulcea.
Within a few years a redevelopment of the site-specific biodiversity occurred and ecosystem services like nutrient retention and fish recruitment became obvious.
Additionally, the reconnected polder enable reed harvesting, grazing, fishing and ecotourism.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: The Babina Restoration Project
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationFunding sources for post-project management and maintenance came from national budget.
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|