Case study:Odder Stream Restoration: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project picture=Prea-an-post restoration.jpg
|Project picture=Prea-an-post restoration.jpg
|Picture description=The Odder before (right) and after (left) restoration
|Picture description=The Odder before (left) and after (right) restoration
|Project summary=This project aimed to:  
|Project summary=This project aimed to:  


Line 92: Line 92:
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Re-introducing of stones and spawning gravel, Bed raising,  
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Re-introducing spawning gravel, Bed raising,
|Management interventions=Removed 25 drain systems and 7 ditches
|Management interventions=Removed 25 drain systems and 7 ditches
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:43, 1 June 2017

4.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 55° 55' 58.33" N, 9° 18' 34.86" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.vejle.dk/Borger/Natur-og-miljoe/Naturprojekter/Odderbaek--projekter-i-hele-oplandet.aspx
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture
Country Denmark
Main contact forename Bo
Main contact surname Levesen
Main contact user ID User:LauraRRC
Contact organisation Vejle Kommune
Contact organisation web site http://www.vejle.dk/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
The Odder before (left) and after (right) restoration

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project aimed to:

(1) Remove 480 kg P per year – equals ¾ of the total Phosphorus loading to Kul Lake; (2) Remove 18 tons N per year or 114 kg/N/ha per year; (3) Stoppage of vegetation cutting and dredging; (4) Removal of all dams/weirs in the entire watershed; (5) Ensure habitat for the orchid Coralroot (Corallorhiza trifida) and Western marsh orchid (Dactylorhiza majalis; (6) Improve habitat for the European brook lamprey (Lampetra planeri) and Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra; and (7) Open the area to the public for recreation – 37 km of trials.

The restoration activities in the first 65 hectares included:

(1) Restoring 1.3 km of stream; (2) Raised the stream bed 50 – 80 cm; (3) Crushed/removed 25 drain systems and 7 ditches; (4) Spawning grounds every 20 meters in the stream – 650 m3 gravel; (5) 15.2 hectares of permanent/semi-permanent wetlands; (6) 8.5 hectares of seasonally flooded wetlands; (7) 6 hectares of seepage wetlands from removing drains; and (8) Area is fenced to allow grazing over entire area – special agreements between land owners.

The River Restoration Centre would like to thank Matthew William Cochran, from ORBICON, for providing the information and photographs for this case study.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Before (2).jpg
After (1).jpg
After (2).jpg
After (4).JPG
After (5).JPG
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Jutland and Funen
River basin Odder

Subcatchment

River name
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Odder Stream
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 65 hectares"hectares" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2010/11/01
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) 2,975.814632,975.815 k€ <br />2,975,814.63 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries; Vejle Kommune

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring

Supplementary funding information

Costs 10,840,000 Danish Kroners ( ,971,000 million) support from the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries 250,000 DKK (,500) support from Vejle Kommune 11,090,000 DKK (,016,000)

Archaeology survey – 23,000 DKK (,000) Construction costs – 1,925,000 DKK (0,000) Administrative costs – 26,000 DKK (,000) Compensation to landowners – 7,875,000 DKK ( ,430,000) Maintenance of wetland area (grazing) – 985,000 DKK (0,000) Design and consulting services – 250,000 DKK (,500)



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration, Phosphate
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Re-introducing spawning gravel, Bed raising
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Removed 25 drain systems and 7 ditches
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information