Case study:Diversion of the River Nith: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank stabilisation and erosion protection, Introduction of gravel, Habitat diversification, | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Bank stabilisation and erosion protection, Introduction of gravel, Habitat diversification, | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Containment bund to prevent flooding | |Floodplain / River corridor=Containment bund to prevent flooding | ||
|Other technical measure=Addition of boulders to bed, | |Other technical measure=Addition of boulders to bed, Fish habitat restoration, | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} | {{Hydromorphological quality elements header}} |
Revision as of 10:57, 1 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Scotland |
Main contact forename | Charles |
Main contact surname | Perfect |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Centre for River EcoSystem Science |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | East Ayrshire Council, SEPA, SNH, RSPB, Nith Salmon Fisheries Board, New Cumnock Angling Association, Halcrow, River Restoration Centre |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
PHASE 1: 2000 - Temporary diversion of the Nith to the north west of its current floodplain to allow for coal extraction by Scottish Coal.
The Nith is an important salmon and trout fishery, however overgrazing, agriculture and past open-cast mining along the reach have affected invertebrate populations and fish spawning grounds.
The primary restoration criteria for the 2000 restoration were:
- design which would convey a 1 in 50 year flood.
- channel which would not dry up during low flow.
- design mimicing pre-diversion channel - ie. similar meander loops, pool-riffle-run sequences and channel profiles.
- design which would create opportunities for enhancement of biodiversity (over and above pre-diversion conditions).
Work commenced in April 2000 and was completed during September of the same year.
PHASE 2: During 2004, the former course was enhanced and reconnected to the rest of the river and the temporary channel cut off to allow mining to progress across the floodplain. The site was subject to significant post-restoration biological monitoring as part of a PhD programme through CRESS (Centre for River Ecosystem Science - University of Stirling) - to ensure the new channel was performing well, ecologically.
2000: channel bed/ground layer consisted of existing substrate with clay lining. 2004: Geotextile reinforcement of banks, to reduce bank erosion. Clay mattress lining to prevent water percolating through unconsolidated substrate and flowing as groundwater through potentially contaminated mine tailings. Gravel added to bed to create habitat diversity for invertebrates and fish. 2000: Containment bund constructed to prevent flooding of mine workings.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationPhase 1: 3900000 (thousands of euros)
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|