Case study:The Ciobarciu Wetland Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Floodplain / River corridor=Creation of wetland, Removal of embankments, | |||
|Planform / Channel pattern=Re-instatement of old course | |||
|Other technical measure=Restoration flow on old Jijia | |||
|Social measures=Land purchase/Improved public access | |||
|Floodplain / River corridor= | |Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Consultation | ||
|Planform / Channel pattern= | |||
|Other technical measure= | |||
|Social measures= | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Revision as of 09:47, 1 June 2017
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.ciobarciu.ro |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Romania |
Main contact forename | Anca |
Main contact surname | Savin |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.apeprut.ro |
Partner organisations | Institute for Inland Water Management RIZA, Regional Water Board Hunze&Aa's, Het Drentse Landschap (NGO for nature management) |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Ciobarciu Wetland Project is an ecological rehabilitation project in the valley of the river Prut.
In order to prevent flooding and to extend agricultural surfaces, the common floodplain of Prut and Jijia was embanked. Jijia river course was deviated by digging a channel to the Prut at Chiperesti. The last 56 km of the Jijia river, which is parallel to the Prut, has been cut-off (it is now known as the Old Jijia). The Old Jijia can be supplied with water from the Jijia by the hydrotechnical knot at Chiperesti when needed. Otherwise, the Old Jijia is only supplied from its own river basin by four small tributaries with intermittent flow.
The Ciobarciu Wetland was created in October 2006 after first flooding of this area.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ecological Restoration of Mata-Radeanu Complex, Ecological Restoration of Natural Lake Pochina, Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|